Od regresji do klasyfikacji: decyzje progowe
Poznaj przyczyny, dla których regresja liniowa nie sprawdza się dla wyników binarnych, oraz zobacz, jak próg przekształca wynik w etykietę klasy.
Od regresji do klasyfikacji: decyzje progowe to bezpłatna lekcja Machine Learning Academy na CoddyKit. To lekcja 1 z 4. Możesz przeczytać całą lekcję poniżej za darmo — a potem ćwiczyć ją interaktywnie w przeglądarce z wbudowanym edytorem kodu i tutorem AI dostępnym 24/7. To część ścieżki edukacyjnej Machine Learning Academy, a Twój postęp synchronizuje się między webem a aplikacją CoddyKit. Kurs Machine Learning Academy zawiera 4 lekcji w sumie.
Części tej lekcji nie zostały jeszcze przetłumaczone i są wyświetlane po angielsku.
What Is Classification?
Classification is the supervised learning task of predicting which category an input belongs to, rather than predicting a continuous number. Examples include:
- Predicting whether an email is spam or not-spam (binary).
- Predicting which digit (0-9) is in an image (multi-class).
- Predicting which disease a patient has given symptoms (multi-class).
The key distinction from regression: the output is a discrete label, not a real number. This seemingly small change requires different algorithms, different loss functions, and different evaluation metrics.
Why Linear Regression Fails for Classification
A tempting approach is to encode class 0 and class 1 as numbers and apply linear regression. For example, encode 'not spam' as 0 and 'spam' as 1, then train a linear regressor. The immediate problem: linear regression produces outputs anywhere from -∞ to +∞, but probabilities must be between 0 and 1. A prediction of 1.7 for class membership is meaningless.
A second problem: linear regression tries to pull the best-fit line through all examples. Adding a clear outlier far from the boundary can rotate the line so it misclassifies many previously-correct examples. The loss function is fundamentally wrong for binary outcomes.
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from sklearn.linear_model import LinearRegression
# Binary dataset: 1 = spam, 0 = not spam
word_count = np.array([10, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 200]).reshape(-1, 1)
spam = np.array([0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1])
model = LinearRegression()
model.fit(word_count, spam)
# Problematic: predictions outside [0,1]
predictions = model.predict([[5], [25], [200]])
print('Linear regression predictions (should be 0 or 1):')
print(predictions) # might be negative or >1Threshold Decisions: Converting Scores to Labels
The simplest approach to classification is to use a regression model's output as a score and apply a threshold to convert it to a binary label. If the score is above the threshold, predict class 1; below it, predict class 0.
With a linear regression output, you might choose a threshold of 0.5: anything above 0.5 is spam, below is not-spam. This is called a threshold classifier. While crude, it illustrates the key concept: scores must be converted to decisions, and the choice of threshold involves a trade-off between different types of errors.
import numpy as np
from sklearn.linear_model import LinearRegression
X = np.array([10, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50]).reshape(-1, 1)
y = np.array([0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1])
model = LinearRegression()
model.fit(X, y)
# Apply threshold to convert scores to labels
X_new = np.array([[15], [28], [45]])
scores = model.predict(X_new)
threshold = 0.5
labels = (scores >= threshold).astype(int)
for x, score, label in zip(X_new.ravel(), scores, labels):
print(f'x={x}: score={score:.2f} -> label={label}')The Problems with a Fixed Threshold
Choosing a threshold of 0.5 is arbitrary. The optimal threshold depends on the relative cost of different error types:
- A false positive (predict spam when it is not) means a legitimate email lands in the spam folder.
- A false negative (predict not-spam when it is spam) means junk email reaches the inbox.
In medical diagnosis, the costs are much more asymmetric: a false negative (missing a real disease) may be catastrophic, so you lower the threshold to catch more true positives even at the cost of more false alarms. The threshold is a business decision, not a mathematical one.
import numpy as np
# Same scores, different thresholds give different label distributions
scores = np.array([0.2, 0.45, 0.55, 0.7, 0.85, 0.95])
y_true = np.array([0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1])
for threshold in [0.3, 0.5, 0.7]:
labels = (scores >= threshold).astype(int)
correct = (labels == y_true).sum()
print(f'Threshold {threshold}: labels={labels.tolist()}, correct={correct}/{len(y_true)}')Binary vs Multi-Class Classification
Binary classification has exactly two possible output classes (spam/not-spam, disease/healthy, fraud/legitimate). Multi-class classification has three or more classes (which digit 0-9, which species of flower, which product category).
Most binary classifiers extend to multi-class through two strategies:
- One-vs-Rest (OvR): train one binary classifier per class, predict the class whose classifier is most confident.
- One-vs-One (OvO): train a binary classifier for every pair of classes, take a majority vote.
Scikit-learn handles this automatically for most algorithms.
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
from sklearn.datasets import load_iris
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
# Iris has 3 classes: sklearn handles multi-class automatically
X, y = load_iris(return_X_y=True)
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, random_state=42)
model = LogisticRegression(multi_class='ovr', max_iter=200)
model.fit(X_train, y_train)
print('Test accuracy:', model.score(X_test, y_test).round(3))
print('Classes:', model.classes_)Decision Boundaries: Where the Model Decides
A classifier divides the feature space into regions, one for each class. The boundary between regions is called the decision boundary. For a linear classifier, the decision boundary is a straight line (in 2D), a plane (in 3D), or a hyperplane (in higher dimensions).
The location and shape of the decision boundary is what the algorithm learns during training. Visualising the decision boundary on a 2D dataset is one of the best ways to build intuition for how a classifier works and why its predictions are correct or wrong in specific regions of the feature space.
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
from sklearn.datasets import make_classification
X, y = make_classification(n_samples=100, n_features=2, n_redundant=0, random_state=42)
model = LogisticRegression()
model.fit(X, y)
# Plot decision boundary
xx, yy = np.meshgrid(np.linspace(-3, 3, 200), np.linspace(-3, 3, 200))
Z = model.predict(np.c_[xx.ravel(), yy.ravel()]).reshape(xx.shape)
plt.contourf(xx, yy, Z, alpha=0.3)
plt.scatter(X[:, 0], X[:, 1], c=y, edgecolors='k', alpha=0.8)
plt.title('Linear Decision Boundary')
plt.show()Accuracy: The Most Intuitive Metric
Accuracy is the fraction of predictions that are correct: accuracy = correct_predictions / total_predictions. It is the most intuitive metric and appropriate when classes are balanced and all errors are equally costly.
However, accuracy is a trap for imbalanced datasets. If 95% of emails are legitimate and your model predicts 'not spam' for everything, it achieves 95% accuracy while completely failing at its job — never catching a single spam email. This is the accuracy paradox, and it motivates more informative metrics like precision and recall.
from sklearn.metrics import accuracy_score
import numpy as np
# Balanced dataset
y_true_balanced = np.array([0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1])
y_pred_balanced = np.array([0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1])
print(f'Balanced accuracy: {accuracy_score(y_true_balanced, y_pred_balanced):.2f}') # 0.75
# Imbalanced: 95% class 0
y_true_imb = np.array([0]*95 + [1]*5)
y_pred_always0 = np.zeros(100, dtype=int)
print(f'Imbalanced accuracy (always predict 0): {accuracy_score(y_true_imb, y_pred_always0):.2f}') # 0.95!The Predict vs Predict_proba Distinction
Most scikit-learn classifiers provide two prediction methods:
predict(X)— returns the hard class label after applying the default threshold (usually 0.5 for binary classification).predict_proba(X)— returns a probability array of shape(n_samples, n_classes), giving the model's confidence in each class.
Using predict_proba gives you much more control because you can apply any threshold. This is essential for business applications where the optimal threshold is not 0.5.
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
from sklearn.datasets import make_classification
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
import numpy as np
X, y = make_classification(n_samples=200, n_features=5, random_state=42)
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.2)
model = LogisticRegression()
model.fit(X_train, y_train)
# Hard labels
hard_labels = model.predict(X_test[:5])
print('Hard labels:', hard_labels)
# Probabilities
probas = model.predict_proba(X_test[:5])
print('Probabilities (class 0, class 1):')
for row in probas:
print(f' Not spam: {row[0]:.2f} | Spam: {row[1]:.2f}')Custom Thresholds in Practice
Applying a custom threshold to probability outputs lets you tune the trade-off between false positives and false negatives without retraining the model. This is called threshold moving and is a common post-processing step in production systems.
Lower threshold → model flags more examples as positive → more true positives but also more false positives. Higher threshold → more conservative → fewer false positives but more false negatives. The right threshold is determined by the cost of each error type in your specific application.
import numpy as np
from sklearn.metrics import confusion_matrix
# Get probability scores for positive class
spam_probas = model.predict_proba(X_test)[:, 1]
print('Confusion matrices at different thresholds:')
for threshold in [0.3, 0.5, 0.7]:
y_pred = (spam_probas >= threshold).astype(int)
cm = confusion_matrix(y_test, y_pred)
tp = cm[1, 1]
fp = cm[0, 1]
fn = cm[1, 0]
tn = cm[0, 0]
print(f'\nThreshold {threshold}: TP={tp} FP={fp} FN={fn} TN={tn}')Common Classification Algorithms Overview
Linear regression with a threshold is just the beginning. Scikit-learn provides many dedicated classification algorithms, each with strengths and weaknesses:
- Logistic Regression — the proper probabilistic linear classifier (next lesson).
- K-Nearest Neighbors — classifies by majority vote of nearest training examples.
- Decision Trees — rule-based, fully interpretable.
- Random Forest — ensemble of trees, robust and powerful.
- SVM — finds the maximum-margin hyperplane.
- Naive Bayes — fast, probabilistic, excellent for text.
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
from sklearn.tree import DecisionTreeClassifier
from sklearn.neighbors import KNeighborsClassifier
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier
from sklearn.datasets import load_breast_cancer
from sklearn.model_selection import cross_val_score
X, y = load_breast_cancer(return_X_y=True)
for name, clf in [('Logistic Regression', LogisticRegression(max_iter=1000)),
('Decision Tree', DecisionTreeClassifier()),
('KNN', KNeighborsClassifier()),
('Random Forest', RandomForestClassifier())]:
score = cross_val_score(clf, X, y, cv=5, scoring='accuracy').mean()
print(f'{name}: {score:.3f}')Quick Check
Test your understanding of Machine Learning with Python concepts from this lesson.
Lesson Recap
In this lesson you learned: linear regression fails for binary classification because it produces unbounded outputs that cannot represent probabilities, applying a threshold converts probability scores to class labels with a tunable trade-off between false positives and false negatives, and accuracy is misleading for imbalanced datasets — recall and precision provide a more complete picture. Next up we study logistic regression — the proper probabilistic linear classifier that uses the sigmoid function to produce calibrated probabilities.
Często zadawane pytania
Czy lekcja „Od regresji do klasyfikacji: decyzje progowe” jest bezpłatna?
Tak — pełny tekst „Od regresji do klasyfikacji: decyzje progowe” jest dostępny za darmo tutaj w sieci. Aby ćwiczyć ją interaktywnie (wbudowany edytor kodu i tutor AI dostępny 24/7) i odblokować resztę kursu Machine Learning Academy, przejdź na CoddyKit PRO. Kurs Machine Learning Academy zawiera 4 lekcji w sumie.
Co nauczysz się w „Od regresji do klasyfikacji: decyzje progowe”?
Poznaj przyczyny, dla których regresja liniowa nie sprawdza się dla wyników binarnych, oraz zobacz, jak próg przekształca wynik w etykietę klasy. Ćwiczysz Machine Learning Academy z praktycznym kodem, który uruchamiasz bezpośrednio w przeglądarce, a tutor AI dostępny 24/7 odpowiada na Twoje pytania podczas pracy nad lekcją.
Czy potrzebuję doświadczenia, aby zacząć Machine Learning Academy?
Nie wymagamy żadnego doświadczenia. Machine Learning Academy w CoddyKit jest strukturyzowany dla początkujących i zaawansowanych użytkowników, więc możesz zacząć tutaj lub od początku i uczyć się w swoim tempie. To lekcja 1 z 4.
Ile czasu zajmuje lekcja „Od regresji do klasyfikacji: decyzje progowe”?
Większość lekcji CoddyKit trwa około 5–10 minut. Każda lekcja to mały, interaktywny krok, dzięki czemu robisz systematyczne postępy i zawsze wracasz dokładnie do tego samego miejsca — na webie i w aplikacji.
Czy mogę pisać i uruchamiać kod w tej lekcji Machine Learning Academy?
Tak. Każda lekcja Machine Learning Academy zawiera wbudowany edytor kodu, więc piszesz i uruchamiasz prawdziwy kod bezpośrednio w przeglądarce i od razu otrzymujesz sprzężenie zwrotne od AI — bez konfiguracji na komputerze.
Wszystkie lekcje w tym kursie
- Od regresji do klasyfikacji: decyzje progowe
- Regresja logistyczna i funkcja sigmoid
- Macierz pomyłek wyjaśniona
- Precyzja, czułość i F1-score w praktyce