0Pricing
React Native Academy · 课时

提交审核与回应拒绝

使用 EAS Submit 或 Transporter 上传构建版本,在 App Store Connect 中选择该版本进行审核,并了解最常见的拒绝原因及应对方法。

提交审核与回应拒绝 是 CoddyKit 上的免费 React Native Academy 课时。 这是第 4 节课,共 4 节。 你可以在下方免费阅读本课时的完整内容 — 然后在浏览器中使用内置代码编辑器和全天候 AI 导师进行实践。 这是 React Native Academy 学习路径的一部分,你的进度在网页和 CoddyKit 应用中同步。 React Native Academy 课程共包含 4 节课。

本课时的部分内容尚未翻译,以英文显示。

The App Review Process

After you submit your app for review, Apple's App Review team manually and automatically tests it against the App Store Review Guidelines. Review times average 1–3 business days for a first submission and often less for updates. You can check the status in App Store Connect: Waiting for Review, In Review, Ready for Sale, or Rejected. Apple may ask clarifying questions via the Resolution Center before completing the review.

Submitting the Build for Review

With all metadata complete and a build selected, click Add for Review in App Store Connect, then Submit to App Review. Apple checks you answered all legal questions (export compliance, content rights, content rating). Once submitted you receive an email confirmation. The app moves to Waiting for Review — you cannot edit metadata while it is under review, but you can remove the submission and resubmit if you catch a critical issue.

# Alternatively, use EAS Submit to upload AND trigger review:
eas submit --platform ios --latest

# EAS submit options:
# --latest           Use the most recent build
# --id <build-id>    Submit a specific build
# --non-interactive  For CI pipelines

# Check submission status:
eas submission:list --platform ios

Common Rejection Reasons

Understanding common rejection reasons helps you avoid them proactively. The most frequent causes are: crashes during review (test thoroughly before submitting), broken links in the support/privacy URL, misleading screenshots that don't match actual app behavior, missing functionality (the reviewer cannot log in without test credentials), and privacy guideline violations (collecting data without disclosure or user consent).

// Top rejection categories (from Apple data):

// Guideline 2.1 - App Completeness:
//   Crashes, broken links, test content visible in production

// Guideline 4.0 - Design:
//   UI that doesn't match screenshots, placeholder text left in

// Guideline 5.1 - Privacy:
//   Collecting user data without disclosure or tracking without ATT

// Guideline 3.1 - Payments:
//   Selling digital goods outside of Apple's IAP system

// Guideline 1.0 - Objectionable Content:
//   Offensive content, hate speech, graphic violence

The Resolution Center

When your app is rejected, Apple posts the reason in the Resolution Center in App Store Connect. You can reply directly to the reviewer, ask clarifying questions, and provide additional context. If you believe the rejection is incorrect, you can appeal or request a phone call with the App Review team. Resolution Center messages are timestamped — Apple typically responds within 1–2 business days.

// Resolution Center communication tips:

// 1. Read the full rejection message carefully
//    Apple often quotes the specific guideline violated

// 2. Ask clarifying questions if the rejection is vague
//    'Could you clarify which specific screen had the crash?'

// 3. Explain your fix clearly
//    'We have fixed the crash by adding a null check in line 45.
//     The updated build (version 1.0.1) addresses this.'

// 4. Provide a video if the feature is hard to find
//    Attach a screen recording to your reply

Guideline 2.1: App Completeness

Guideline 2.1 rejections mean the reviewer found the app incomplete or non-functional. Common causes include: broken flows the reviewer could not complete, missing test credentials, a feature that works only on specific device models, or a login that fails (perhaps your staging backend is down). Always test the app on a clean device with a fresh account using the exact credentials you provided in the review notes.

// Pre-submission checklist to avoid 2.1:

// 1. Test on a REAL device (not just simulator)
// 2. Create a dedicated review account and TEST IT
//    - Log in fresh (don't use a pre-seeded account)
//    - Complete the sign-up flow from scratch
// 3. Test every tab / navigation path
// 4. Test with a fresh install (no leftover cached state)
// 5. Check that all images, API calls, and links load
// 6. Verify screenshot accuracy matches current app UI

Guideline 5.1: Privacy Violations

Apple enforces privacy guidelines strictly. Guideline 5.1 covers: collecting device data without user consent, using IDFA/device fingerprinting without the ATT (App Tracking Transparency) prompt, missing usage description strings in Info.plist, and not disclosing collected data in the Data Safety section. The ATT framework must be implemented if you track users across apps or websites — calling requestTrackingAuthorization() before any tracking activity.

// App Tracking Transparency (ATT) - required for tracking
import { requestTrackingPermissionsAsync } from 'expo-tracking-transparency';

async function requestTracking() {
  const { status } = await requestTrackingPermissionsAsync();
  if (status === 'granted') {
    // User opted in — enable analytics/ads
    initializeAnalytics();
  } else {
    // User declined — use anonymous/aggregated data only
    initializeAnonymousAnalytics();
  }
}

// Info.plist required:
// NSUserTrackingUsageDescription: 'We use tracking to personalize ads.'

Guideline 3.1: Payment Guidelines

If your app sells digital goods or subscriptions, Apple mandates they go through its In-App Purchase (IAP) system. You cannot link to a web payment flow for digital content that can be used in the app — doing so triggers a Guideline 3.1 rejection. Physical goods (e.g., ordering a pizza), services rendered in-person (e.g., a taxi ride), and business-to-business sales have explicit exemptions. When in doubt, use IAP.

// What requires Apple IAP:
// - Premium features / unlocks
// - Subscriptions to content or services
// - Virtual currency / gems
// - Consumable boosts inside the app

// What does NOT require IAP:
// - Selling physical goods (ecommerce)
// - Services delivered in-person (food delivery, rideshare)
// - B2B enterprise sales
// - Reader apps reading content purchased elsewhere (Reader Rule)
//   e.g., Kindle, Spotify (no in-app upgrade allowed though)

Expedited Review Requests

Apple offers an expedited review process for time-sensitive situations: critical bug fixes, security vulnerabilities discovered in production, or a release tied to a major media event. Submit an expedited review request through the Resolution Center after submitting the build. Provide a business justification — Apple evaluates requests individually and approves a subset. This does not guarantee same-day approval but typically cuts wait time significantly.

// When to request expedited review:
// - Production crash affecting >X% of users
// - Security vulnerability that needs immediate patch
// - Legal deadline (court order, regulation change)
// - Major event launch (Conference release, holiday launch)

// Process:
// App Store Connect > Resolution Center
// > Request Expedited Review
// > Choose: App Update
// > Explain the urgency (2-3 sentences)
// > Submit request

Responding to a Metadata Rejection

Metadata rejections (name, screenshots, description) do not always require a new binary. You can update the metadata and resubmit the same build for review. Fix the specific item called out (e.g., a screenshot showing a feature you removed), update it in App Store Connect, and reply in the Resolution Center explaining what you changed. This can be resolved much faster than issues requiring code changes.

// Metadata rejection workflow:
// 1. Read the specific guideline cited
// 2. Update the metadata in App Store Connect
//    (Screenshots, Description, Keywords, etc.)
// 3. Go to Resolution Center
// 4. Reply with:
//    'We have updated the screenshot for the Home tab to accurately
//     reflect the current app UI. The feature shown (X) is available
//     after sign-in. Please see the updated screenshot attached.'
// 5. Click 'Resubmit for Review' (not a new version submission)

Appealing a Rejection

If you disagree with a rejection, you can formally appeal to the App Review Board. This is appropriate when you believe your app complies with the guidelines and the reviewer made an error. File the appeal through the Resolution Center, citing the specific guideline you believe you comply with and providing evidence. Appeals take longer than just fixing and resubmitting. For borderline cases, consider calling the App Review team — it is a real phone conversation with a reviewer.

// When to appeal vs. fix-and-resubmit:

// Fix and resubmit (faster):
// - Clear violation you can fix in < 1 day
// - Crash reproducible and fixable
// - Missing info you can add easily

// Appeal:
// - You genuinely comply but reviewer misread the app
// - You need a policy exception for your use case
// - Your app is being held to a different standard
//   than similar apps already on the store

// Resolution Center > Reply to Review > Request Appeal

Post-Approval: Phased Release

After approval, instead of releasing to all users immediately, use Phased Release. Apple rolls out the update to a percentage of users over 7 days (1%, 2%, 5%, 10%, 20%, 50%, 100%). You can pause the rollout at any point if crash rates spike. This limits the blast radius of a bug that slipped through testing. Phased release is available for app updates, not first submissions.

// Enable Phased Release in App Store Connect:
// My Apps > Version > Phased Release for Automatic Updates
// Select: Release over 7-day period

// Day 1: 1% of users
// Day 2: 2% of users
// Day 3: 5% of users
// Day 4: 10% of users
// Day 5: 20% of users
// Day 6: 50% of users
// Day 7: 100% of users

// You can manually pause if crash rates rise:
// Version > Phased Release > Pause

Quick Check

Test your understanding of React Native Mobile Development concepts from this lesson.

Lesson Recap

In this lesson you learned: how the App Store review process works and typical timelines, how to use the Resolution Center to respond to and appeal rejections, and how to avoid the most common rejection reasons (2.1 completeness, 5.1 privacy, 3.1 payments). You also saw how to request expedited review and use Phased Release to limit rollout risk. Next up we cover creating a keystore and signing the Android AAB.

常见问题解答

「提交审核与回应拒绝」课时是免费的吗?

是的 — 「提交审核与回应拒绝」的完整文本可在网页上免费阅读。要进行交互式练习(内置代码编辑器和全天候 AI 导师)并解锁 React Native Academy 课程的其余内容,请升级到 CoddyKit PRO。 React Native Academy 课程共包含 4 节课。

「提交审核与回应拒绝」这节课中我会学到什么?

使用 EAS Submit 或 Transporter 上传构建版本,在 App Store Connect 中选择该版本进行审核,并了解最常见的拒绝原因及应对方法。 你通过在浏览器中直接运行的动手代码来练习 React Native Academy,全天候 AI 导师会在你学习这节课的过程中回答你的问题。

学习 React Native Academy 需要有经验吗?

无需任何先前经验。CoddyKit 上的 React Native Academy 课程适合初学者到高级学习者,你可以从这里开始或从头开始,按照自己的节奏学习。 这是第 4 节课,共 4 节。

「提交审核与回应拒绝」课时需要多长时间?

大多数 CoddyKit 课程大约需要 5–10 分钟。每节课都很精短且互动,所以你能稳步进步,并在网页和应用中从离开的地方继续。

我能在这节 React Native Academy 课中编写并运行代码吗?

能。每节 React Native Academy 课都包含内置代码编辑器,你可以在浏览器中直接编写并运行真实代码,并获得即时 AI 反馈 — 无需本地设置。

此课程中的所有课时

  1. Apple 开发者账户设置与证书
  2. 使用 EAS Build 配置签名
  3. 在 App Store Connect 中准备 App Store 元数据
  4. 提交审核与回应拒绝
← 返回 React Native Academy