0Pricing
AI Prompt Engineering · 课时

生成提示词的提示词

系统提示词生成器、人设生成器和面向特定任务的提示词工厂。

生成提示词的提示词 是 CoddyKit 上的免费 AI Prompt Engineering 课时。 这是第 2 节课,共 4 节。 你可以在下方免费阅读本课时的完整内容 — 然后在浏览器中使用内置代码编辑器和全天候 AI 导师进行实践。 这是 AI Prompt Engineering 学习路径的一部分,你的进度在网页和 CoddyKit 应用中同步。 AI Prompt Engineering 课程共包含 4 节课。

提示词工厂

提示词工厂是一种元提示词,可以针对给定任务生成多个提示词变体。您不必只编写一个提示词,而是指定任务和约束条件,由工厂生成一组候选提示词,供您测试和选择。

生成系统提示词变体

请让模型针对同一角色生成 N 个不同的系统提示词变体,每个变体采用不同的语气或沟通风格。这是对系统提示词进行 A/B 测试的起点。

import anthropic

client = anthropic.Anthropic(api_key='YOUR_API_KEY')

VARIANT_FACTORY_PROMPT = '''Generate {num_variants} different system prompt variants
for a coding assistant targeting junior developers.

Each variant should have a distinctly different approach:
- Variant 1: Friendly and encouraging mentor style
- Variant 2: Concise and technical style
- Variant 3: Socratic method (asks guiding questions instead of giving answers)
- Variant 4: Game-based, uses analogies and rewards
- Variant 5: Strict teacher who corrects mistakes firmly but fairly

For each variant output:
{{"id": 1, "style": "<style name>", "prompt": "<full system prompt>"}}

Return as a JSON array.'''

def generate_prompt_variants(num_variants=5):
    import json
    response = client.messages.create(
        model='claude-opus-4-5', max_tokens=3000,
        messages=[{'role': 'user', 'content':
            VARIANT_FACTORY_PROMPT.format(num_variants=num_variants)}]
    )
    return json.loads(response.content[0].text)

variants = generate_prompt_variants(5)
for v in variants[:2]:
    print(f'Variant {v["id"]} ({v["style"]}): {v["prompt"][:80]}...')

任务专用提示词模板生成器

提示词模板生成器会针对特定任务类型生成参数化模板。输出的是可重复使用的模板,而不是一次性提示词。

TEMPLATE_FACTORY_PROMPT = '''Create a production-ready prompt template for the following task.

Task type: {task_type}
Domain: {domain}
Target audience: {audience}

Requirements for the template:
1. Use {{variable}} placeholders for all input values
2. Include role/persona definition
3. Specify exact output format
4. Add quality constraints
5. Include a worked example using {{example_input}} placeholder

Also output:
- variables: list of all {variable} placeholders and their descriptions
- suggested_model: which Claude/GPT model tier is appropriate
- estimated_tokens: rough estimate of output token count

Return as JSON: {{template, variables, suggested_model, estimated_tokens}}'''

def generate_task_template(task_type, domain, audience):
    import json
    response = client.messages.create(
        model='claude-opus-4-5', max_tokens=1500,
        messages=[{'role': 'user', 'content':
            TEMPLATE_FACTORY_PROMPT.format(
                task_type=task_type,
                domain=domain,
                audience=audience
            )}]
    )
    return json.loads(response.content[0].text)

template = generate_task_template(
    task_type='summarization',
    domain='legal contracts',
    audience='non-lawyer business executives'
)
print('Template preview:', template['template'][:200], '...')
print('Variables:', template.get('variables', [])[:3])

角色设定提示词工厂

角色设定工厂会生成完整的角色设定,包括系统提示词、示例对话和反模式(该角色绝不应说或做的事情)。

PERSONA_FACTORY_PROMPT = '''Design a complete AI assistant persona for: {application}.

Output a JSON object with these keys:
- name: persona name
- tagline: one-sentence description
- system_prompt: full system prompt (150-250 words)
- communication_style: 4-5 sentences describing how this persona communicates
- example_good_response: example of an ideal response to a typical user question
- example_bad_response: example of a response that would break character or violate guidelines
- persona_rules: list of 5 behavioral rules specific to this persona
- forbidden_phrases: list of 5 phrases this persona would never use

Make the persona distinct, consistent, and aligned with the application context.'''

def generate_persona(application):
    import json
    response = client.messages.create(
        model='claude-opus-4-5', max_tokens=2000,
        messages=[{'role': 'user', 'content':
            PERSONA_FACTORY_PROMPT.format(application=application)}]
    )
    return json.loads(response.content[0].text)

persona = generate_persona('a mental wellness check-in app for university students')
print('Persona:', persona['name'])
print('Tagline:', persona['tagline'])
print('System prompt preview:', persona['system_prompt'][:150], '...')

测试用例生成器

元提示词可以生成多样化的测试用例,用于评估提示词质量。测试用例工厂会生成覆盖典型用法、边界情况和对抗性输入的用户输入。

TEST_CASE_FACTORY = '''Generate {num_cases} test cases for evaluating an AI assistant.

Assistant description: {assistant_description}

For each test case provide:
- id: number
- category: one of [typical, edge_case, adversarial, off_topic, ambiguous]
- user_message: the input message
- expected_behavior: what a good response should do (not the response itself)
- failure_modes: what wrong responses might look like

Distribution: 5 typical, 3 edge cases, 2 adversarial, 2 off-topic, 3 ambiguous.
Return as JSON array.'''

def generate_test_cases(assistant_description, num_cases=15):
    import json
    response = client.messages.create(
        model='claude-opus-4-5', max_tokens=3000,
        messages=[{'role': 'user', 'content':
            TEST_CASE_FACTORY.format(
                num_cases=num_cases,
                assistant_description=assistant_description
            )}]
    )
    return json.loads(response.content[0].text)

test_cases = generate_test_cases(
    'A Python coding tutor for beginners that explains errors in simple language'
)
for tc in test_cases[:3]:
    print(f'[{tc["category"]}] {tc["user_message"][:60]}...')

少样本示例生成器

手动编写少样本示例需要花费大量时间。少样本示例工厂会根据任务描述和可选的种子示例生成这些示例。

FEW_SHOT_FACTORY = '''Generate {num_examples} high-quality few-shot examples for:
Task: {task_description}

Each example must:
- Be realistic and representative of the actual task
- Show the exact input-output format
- Cover different sub-types or difficulty levels
- Be labeled: [Easy], [Medium], or [Hard]

Format exactly as:
---EXAMPLE {n}---
Input: <input>
Output: <output>
[Difficulty: Easy/Medium/Hard]

Make examples progressively more complex from first to last.'''

def generate_few_shot_examples(task_description, num_examples=5):
    response = client.messages.create(
        model='claude-opus-4-5', max_tokens=2000,
        messages=[{'role': 'user', 'content':
            FEW_SHOT_FACTORY.format(
                task_description=task_description,
                num_examples=num_examples
            )}]
    )
    return response.content[0].text

examples = generate_few_shot_examples(
    'Classify customer emails into: Complaint, Question, Praise, Refund Request'
)
print(examples[:500], '...')

思维链提示词生成器

生成思维链(CoT)提示词需要工厂同时生成推理结构和示例推理链。这是一种更复杂的元提示词,输出的是结构完整的 CoT 提示词。

COT_PROMPT_FACTORY = '''Design a chain-of-thought prompt for solving: {problem_type}

The prompt must:
1. Define the step-by-step reasoning process specific to this problem type
2. Include a worked example showing the full reasoning chain
3. Use "Think step by step" or equivalent CoT trigger phrase
4. End with a clear output specification

Output format:
{
  "cot_trigger": "the trigger phrase",
  "reasoning_steps": ["step 1 description", "step 2 description", ...],
  "worked_example": {
    "problem": "...",
    "reasoning": "Step 1: ... Step 2: ... etc.",
    "answer": "..."
  },
  "full_prompt_template": "the complete template with {problem} placeholder"
}'''

def generate_cot_prompt(problem_type):
    import json
    response = client.messages.create(
        model='claude-opus-4-5', max_tokens=1500,
        messages=[{'role': 'user', 'content':
            COT_PROMPT_FACTORY.format(problem_type=problem_type)}]
    )
    return json.loads(response.content[0].text)

cot = generate_cot_prompt('debugging Python runtime errors')
print('CoT steps:', cot['reasoning_steps'][:3])
print('Trigger:', cot['cot_trigger'])

提示词变体选择与评分

生成多个提示词变体后,请使用评分元提示词在测试前按质量对它们进行排名。这样可以预先筛选候选项,减少所需的实际接口调用次数。

SCORING_PROMPT = '''You are evaluating prompt variants for quality.
Rate each variant on these criteria (1-5):

1. Clarity: Is the task and output format clearly defined?
2. Completeness: Are all necessary instructions present?
3. Constraints: Are appropriate constraints and guardrails in place?
4. Conciseness: Is there unnecessary length that dilutes the prompt?
5. Robustness: Would this handle edge cases and adversarial inputs?

For each variant output:
{"id": <id>, "scores": {clarity: N, completeness: N, constraints: N,
conciseness: N, robustness: N}, "total": N, "rationale": "<2 sentences>"}

Return JSON array sorted by total score descending.

Variants to evaluate:
{variants_json}'''

def rank_prompt_variants(variants):
    import json
    response = client.messages.create(
        model='claude-opus-4-5', max_tokens=2000,
        messages=[{'role': 'user', 'content':
            SCORING_PROMPT.format(
                variants_json=json.dumps(variants, indent=2)
            )}]
    )
    return json.loads(response.content[0].text)

ranked = rank_prompt_variants(variants)
print('Top variant:', ranked[0]['id'], '| Score:', ranked[0]['total'])
print('Rationale:', ranked[0]['rationale'][:100])

提示词差异性:生成最大多样性

生成提示词变体时,多样性与质量同样重要。请使用明确的多样性指令,防止模型生成几乎相同的变体。

DIVERSITY_FACTORY = '''Generate 5 MAXIMALLY DIVERSE prompt variants for:
Task: {task_description}

Diversity requirements:
- Each variant must use a DIFFERENT cognitive approach:
  1. Direct instruction approach
  2. Role-based persona approach
  3. Example-first (few-shot) approach
  4. Constraint-based (tell what NOT to do) approach
  5. Output-format-first approach (start by defining desired output)

- No two variants should share more than 20% of their wording
- Each variant should be completable without reference to the others

For each variant tag it with its approach name.
Return as JSON array: [{"approach": "...", "prompt": "..."}]'''

def generate_diverse_variants(task_description):
    import json
    response = client.messages.create(
        model='claude-opus-4-5', max_tokens=3000,
        messages=[{'role': 'user', 'content':
            DIVERSITY_FACTORY.format(task_description=task_description)}]
    )
    return json.loads(response.content[0].text)

diverse = generate_diverse_variants('Answering customer questions about product returns')
for v in diverse:
    print(f'Approach: {v["approach"]} | Prompt: {v["prompt"][:60]}...')

构建提示词工厂流程

完整的提示词工厂流程会结合生成、评分、多样性检查和输出,形成一组可直接使用的提示词候选项。

def prompt_factory_pipeline(task_description, num_candidates=5, top_k=3):
    print(f'[1/4] Generating {num_candidates} diverse prompt variants...')
    variants = generate_diverse_variants(task_description)

    print('[2/4] Scoring prompt quality...')
    ranked = rank_prompt_variants(variants)

    print('[3/4] Selecting top candidates...')
    top_candidates = ranked[:top_k]

    print('[4/4] Generating test cases for evaluation...')
    test_cases = generate_test_cases(task_description, num_cases=10)

    output = {
        'task': task_description,
        'candidates': top_candidates,
        'test_cases': test_cases,
        'recommendation': (
            f'Start A/B testing with top 3 candidates. '
            f'Run each against {len(test_cases)} test cases. '
            f'Promote the highest-scoring candidate to production.'
        )
    }
    print('Pipeline complete.')
    return output

# result = prompt_factory_pipeline(
#     'Summarizing customer support tickets for a priority queue'
# )
# print(result['recommendation'])

提示词生成中的反模式

提示词工厂存在多种失效模式。了解这些反模式有助于生成更好的元提示词和候选提示词。

PROMPT_FACTORY_ANTIPATTERNS = {
    'Generic variants': {
        'problem': 'All variants say the same thing in slightly different words',
        'cause': 'No diversity instruction in the meta-prompt',
        'fix': 'Explicitly specify different approaches or styles for each variant'
    },
    'Hallucinated instructions': {
        'problem': 'Generated prompt references APIs, rules, or facts that do not exist',
        'cause': 'Model fills gaps in its knowledge with plausible-sounding content',
        'fix': 'Review all domain-specific claims; add validation step'
    },
    'Missing edge case coverage': {
        'problem': 'Generated prompts only handle happy path, not failures',
        'cause': 'Meta-prompt did not specify adversarial/edge case requirements',
        'fix': 'Explicitly ask for edge case handling in the meta-prompt'
    },
    'Over-length inflation': {
        'problem': 'Generated prompts are verbose and repetitive',
        'cause': 'Model padds output without conciseness constraint',
        'fix': 'Add word count constraint: "between 100-200 words"'
    }
}

for pattern, info in PROMPT_FACTORY_ANTIPATTERNS.items():
    print(f'{pattern}:')
    print(f'  Fix: {info["fix"]}')

快速检查

您需要为编码助手生成 5 个系统提示词变体,用于 A/B 测试。要确保这些变体确实不同,最佳的元提示词指令是什么?

提示词工厂总结

提示词工厂使用元提示词技术大规模生成候选提示词:

  • 变体工厂:生成 N 个多样化变体,用于 A/B 测试
  • 模板工厂:根据任务描述生成参数化模板
  • 角色设定工厂:生成完整的角色设定,包括系统提示词和示例
  • 测试用例工厂:生成典型、边界和对抗性测试输入
  • 少样本工厂:按指定难度级别生成输入与输出示例对
  • 评分元提示词:在实际测试前对生成的候选项进行排名
  • 多样性要求:指定不同的方法,防止生成几乎相同的变体

常见问题解答

「生成提示词的提示词」课时是免费的吗?

是的 — 「生成提示词的提示词」的完整文本可在网页上免费阅读。要进行交互式练习(内置代码编辑器和全天候 AI 导师)并解锁 AI Prompt Engineering 课程的其余内容,请升级到 CoddyKit PRO。 AI Prompt Engineering 课程共包含 4 节课。

「生成提示词的提示词」这节课中我会学到什么?

系统提示词生成器、人设生成器和面向特定任务的提示词工厂。 你通过在浏览器中直接运行的动手代码来练习 AI Prompt Engineering,全天候 AI 导师会在你学习这节课的过程中回答你的问题。

学习 AI Prompt Engineering 需要有经验吗?

无需任何先前经验。CoddyKit 上的 AI Prompt Engineering 课程适合初学者到高级学习者,你可以从这里开始或从头开始,按照自己的节奏学习。 这是第 2 节课,共 4 节。

「生成提示词的提示词」课时需要多长时间?

大多数 CoddyKit 课程大约需要 5–10 分钟。每节课都很精短且互动,所以你能稳步进步,并在网页和应用中从离开的地方继续。

我能在这节 AI Prompt Engineering 课中编写并运行代码吗?

能。每节 AI Prompt Engineering 课都包含内置代码编辑器,你可以在浏览器中直接编写并运行真实代码,并获得即时 AI 反馈 — 无需本地设置。

此课程中的所有课时

  1. 什么是元提示词?
  2. 生成提示词的提示词
  3. 自我改进的提示词系统
  4. 自我改进中的评估与选择
← 返回 AI Prompt Engineering