Prompts That Generate Prompts
System prompt generators, persona generators, and task-specific prompt factories.
Prompts That Generate Prompts is a free AI Prompt Engineering lesson on CoddyKit — lesson 2 of 4. You can read the complete lesson below for free — then practise it hands-on in the browser with a built-in code editor and a 24/7 AI tutor. It is part of the AI Prompt Engineering learning path, one of 4 lessons in the course, and your progress syncs across the web and the CoddyKit app.
Prompt Factories
A prompt factory is a meta-prompt that generates multiple prompt variants for a given task. Instead of writing one prompt, you specify the task and constraints, and the factory produces a set of candidates you can test and select from.
Generating System Prompt Variants
Ask the model to generate N different system prompt variants for the same role, each with a different tone or communication style. This is the starting point for A/B testing system prompts.
import anthropic
client = anthropic.Anthropic(api_key='YOUR_API_KEY')
VARIANT_FACTORY_PROMPT = '''Generate {num_variants} different system prompt variants
for a coding assistant targeting junior developers.
Each variant should have a distinctly different approach:
- Variant 1: Friendly and encouraging mentor style
- Variant 2: Concise and technical style
- Variant 3: Socratic method (asks guiding questions instead of giving answers)
- Variant 4: Game-based, uses analogies and rewards
- Variant 5: Strict teacher who corrects mistakes firmly but fairly
For each variant output:
{{"id": 1, "style": "<style name>", "prompt": "<full system prompt>"}}
Return as a JSON array.'''
def generate_prompt_variants(num_variants=5):
import json
response = client.messages.create(
model='claude-opus-4-5', max_tokens=3000,
messages=[{'role': 'user', 'content':
VARIANT_FACTORY_PROMPT.format(num_variants=num_variants)}]
)
return json.loads(response.content[0].text)
variants = generate_prompt_variants(5)
for v in variants[:2]:
print(f'Variant {v["id"]} ({v["style"]}): {v["prompt"][:80]}...')Task-Specific Prompt Template Generator
A prompt template generator produces parameterized templates for specific task types. The output is a reusable template, not a one-off prompt.
TEMPLATE_FACTORY_PROMPT = '''Create a production-ready prompt template for the following task.
Task type: {task_type}
Domain: {domain}
Target audience: {audience}
Requirements for the template:
1. Use {{variable}} placeholders for all input values
2. Include role/persona definition
3. Specify exact output format
4. Add quality constraints
5. Include a worked example using {{example_input}} placeholder
Also output:
- variables: list of all {variable} placeholders and their descriptions
- suggested_model: which Claude/GPT model tier is appropriate
- estimated_tokens: rough estimate of output token count
Return as JSON: {{template, variables, suggested_model, estimated_tokens}}'''
def generate_task_template(task_type, domain, audience):
import json
response = client.messages.create(
model='claude-opus-4-5', max_tokens=1500,
messages=[{'role': 'user', 'content':
TEMPLATE_FACTORY_PROMPT.format(
task_type=task_type,
domain=domain,
audience=audience
)}]
)
return json.loads(response.content[0].text)
template = generate_task_template(
task_type='summarization',
domain='legal contracts',
audience='non-lawyer business executives'
)
print('Template preview:', template['template'][:200], '...')
print('Variables:', template.get('variables', [])[:3])Persona Prompt Factory
A persona factory generates complete persona definitions including system prompts, example dialogues, and anti-patterns (what the persona should never say or do).
PERSONA_FACTORY_PROMPT = '''Design a complete AI assistant persona for: {application}.
Output a JSON object with these keys:
- name: persona name
- tagline: one-sentence description
- system_prompt: full system prompt (150-250 words)
- communication_style: 4-5 sentences describing how this persona communicates
- example_good_response: example of an ideal response to a typical user question
- example_bad_response: example of a response that would break character or violate guidelines
- persona_rules: list of 5 behavioral rules specific to this persona
- forbidden_phrases: list of 5 phrases this persona would never use
Make the persona distinct, consistent, and aligned with the application context.'''
def generate_persona(application):
import json
response = client.messages.create(
model='claude-opus-4-5', max_tokens=2000,
messages=[{'role': 'user', 'content':
PERSONA_FACTORY_PROMPT.format(application=application)}]
)
return json.loads(response.content[0].text)
persona = generate_persona('a mental wellness check-in app for university students')
print('Persona:', persona['name'])
print('Tagline:', persona['tagline'])
print('System prompt preview:', persona['system_prompt'][:150], '...')Test Case Generator
Meta-prompting can generate diverse test cases for evaluating prompt quality. A test case factory produces user inputs covering typical use, edge cases, and adversarial inputs.
TEST_CASE_FACTORY = '''Generate {num_cases} test cases for evaluating an AI assistant.
Assistant description: {assistant_description}
For each test case provide:
- id: number
- category: one of [typical, edge_case, adversarial, off_topic, ambiguous]
- user_message: the input message
- expected_behavior: what a good response should do (not the response itself)
- failure_modes: what wrong responses might look like
Distribution: 5 typical, 3 edge cases, 2 adversarial, 2 off-topic, 3 ambiguous.
Return as JSON array.'''
def generate_test_cases(assistant_description, num_cases=15):
import json
response = client.messages.create(
model='claude-opus-4-5', max_tokens=3000,
messages=[{'role': 'user', 'content':
TEST_CASE_FACTORY.format(
num_cases=num_cases,
assistant_description=assistant_description
)}]
)
return json.loads(response.content[0].text)
test_cases = generate_test_cases(
'A Python coding tutor for beginners that explains errors in simple language'
)
for tc in test_cases[:3]:
print(f'[{tc["category"]}] {tc["user_message"][:60]}...')Few-Shot Example Generator
Few-shot examples take significant time to write manually. A few-shot example factory generates them from a task description and an optional seed example.
FEW_SHOT_FACTORY = '''Generate {num_examples} high-quality few-shot examples for:
Task: {task_description}
Each example must:
- Be realistic and representative of the actual task
- Show the exact input-output format
- Cover different sub-types or difficulty levels
- Be labeled: [Easy], [Medium], or [Hard]
Format exactly as:
---EXAMPLE {n}---
Input: <input>
Output: <output>
[Difficulty: Easy/Medium/Hard]
Make examples progressively more complex from first to last.'''
def generate_few_shot_examples(task_description, num_examples=5):
response = client.messages.create(
model='claude-opus-4-5', max_tokens=2000,
messages=[{'role': 'user', 'content':
FEW_SHOT_FACTORY.format(
task_description=task_description,
num_examples=num_examples
)}]
)
return response.content[0].text
examples = generate_few_shot_examples(
'Classify customer emails into: Complaint, Question, Praise, Refund Request'
)
print(examples[:500], '...')Chain-of-Thought Prompt Generator
Generating chain-of-thought (CoT) prompts requires the factory to produce both the reasoning structure and example reasoning chains. This is a more complex meta-prompt that outputs a fully structured CoT prompt.
COT_PROMPT_FACTORY = '''Design a chain-of-thought prompt for solving: {problem_type}
The prompt must:
1. Define the step-by-step reasoning process specific to this problem type
2. Include a worked example showing the full reasoning chain
3. Use "Think step by step" or equivalent CoT trigger phrase
4. End with a clear output specification
Output format:
{
"cot_trigger": "the trigger phrase",
"reasoning_steps": ["step 1 description", "step 2 description", ...],
"worked_example": {
"problem": "...",
"reasoning": "Step 1: ... Step 2: ... etc.",
"answer": "..."
},
"full_prompt_template": "the complete template with {problem} placeholder"
}'''
def generate_cot_prompt(problem_type):
import json
response = client.messages.create(
model='claude-opus-4-5', max_tokens=1500,
messages=[{'role': 'user', 'content':
COT_PROMPT_FACTORY.format(problem_type=problem_type)}]
)
return json.loads(response.content[0].text)
cot = generate_cot_prompt('debugging Python runtime errors')
print('CoT steps:', cot['reasoning_steps'][:3])
print('Trigger:', cot['cot_trigger'])Prompt Variant Selection and Scoring
After generating multiple prompt variants, use a scoring meta-prompt to rank them by quality before testing. This pre-filters the candidates and reduces the number of live API calls needed.
SCORING_PROMPT = '''You are evaluating prompt variants for quality.
Rate each variant on these criteria (1-5):
1. Clarity: Is the task and output format clearly defined?
2. Completeness: Are all necessary instructions present?
3. Constraints: Are appropriate constraints and guardrails in place?
4. Conciseness: Is there unnecessary length that dilutes the prompt?
5. Robustness: Would this handle edge cases and adversarial inputs?
For each variant output:
{"id": <id>, "scores": {clarity: N, completeness: N, constraints: N,
conciseness: N, robustness: N}, "total": N, "rationale": "<2 sentences>"}
Return JSON array sorted by total score descending.
Variants to evaluate:
{variants_json}'''
def rank_prompt_variants(variants):
import json
response = client.messages.create(
model='claude-opus-4-5', max_tokens=2000,
messages=[{'role': 'user', 'content':
SCORING_PROMPT.format(
variants_json=json.dumps(variants, indent=2)
)}]
)
return json.loads(response.content[0].text)
ranked = rank_prompt_variants(variants)
print('Top variant:', ranked[0]['id'], '| Score:', ranked[0]['total'])
print('Rationale:', ranked[0]['rationale'][:100])Prompt Divergence: Generating Maximum Diversity
When generating prompt variants, diversity is as important as quality. Use explicit diversity instructions to prevent the model from generating near-identical variants.
DIVERSITY_FACTORY = '''Generate 5 MAXIMALLY DIVERSE prompt variants for:
Task: {task_description}
Diversity requirements:
- Each variant must use a DIFFERENT cognitive approach:
1. Direct instruction approach
2. Role-based persona approach
3. Example-first (few-shot) approach
4. Constraint-based (tell what NOT to do) approach
5. Output-format-first approach (start by defining desired output)
- No two variants should share more than 20% of their wording
- Each variant should be completable without reference to the others
For each variant tag it with its approach name.
Return as JSON array: [{"approach": "...", "prompt": "..."}]'''
def generate_diverse_variants(task_description):
import json
response = client.messages.create(
model='claude-opus-4-5', max_tokens=3000,
messages=[{'role': 'user', 'content':
DIVERSITY_FACTORY.format(task_description=task_description)}]
)
return json.loads(response.content[0].text)
diverse = generate_diverse_variants('Answering customer questions about product returns')
for v in diverse:
print(f'Approach: {v["approach"]} | Prompt: {v["prompt"][:60]}...')Building a Prompt Factory Pipeline
A complete prompt factory pipeline combines generation, scoring, diversity checking, and output into a ready-to-use prompt candidate set.
def prompt_factory_pipeline(task_description, num_candidates=5, top_k=3):
print(f'[1/4] Generating {num_candidates} diverse prompt variants...')
variants = generate_diverse_variants(task_description)
print('[2/4] Scoring prompt quality...')
ranked = rank_prompt_variants(variants)
print('[3/4] Selecting top candidates...')
top_candidates = ranked[:top_k]
print('[4/4] Generating test cases for evaluation...')
test_cases = generate_test_cases(task_description, num_cases=10)
output = {
'task': task_description,
'candidates': top_candidates,
'test_cases': test_cases,
'recommendation': (
f'Start A/B testing with top 3 candidates. '
f'Run each against {len(test_cases)} test cases. '
f'Promote the highest-scoring candidate to production.'
)
}
print('Pipeline complete.')
return output
# result = prompt_factory_pipeline(
# 'Summarizing customer support tickets for a priority queue'
# )
# print(result['recommendation'])Anti-Patterns in Prompt Generation
Prompt factories have failure modes. Understanding these anti-patterns helps produce better meta-prompts and better candidate prompts.
PROMPT_FACTORY_ANTIPATTERNS = {
'Generic variants': {
'problem': 'All variants say the same thing in slightly different words',
'cause': 'No diversity instruction in the meta-prompt',
'fix': 'Explicitly specify different approaches or styles for each variant'
},
'Hallucinated instructions': {
'problem': 'Generated prompt references APIs, rules, or facts that do not exist',
'cause': 'Model fills gaps in its knowledge with plausible-sounding content',
'fix': 'Review all domain-specific claims; add validation step'
},
'Missing edge case coverage': {
'problem': 'Generated prompts only handle happy path, not failures',
'cause': 'Meta-prompt did not specify adversarial/edge case requirements',
'fix': 'Explicitly ask for edge case handling in the meta-prompt'
},
'Over-length inflation': {
'problem': 'Generated prompts are verbose and repetitive',
'cause': 'Model padds output without conciseness constraint',
'fix': 'Add word count constraint: "between 100-200 words"'
}
}
for pattern, info in PROMPT_FACTORY_ANTIPATTERNS.items():
print(f'{pattern}:')
print(f' Fix: {info["fix"]}')Quick Check
You need 5 system prompt variants for A/B testing a coding assistant. What is the best meta-prompt instruction to ensure the variants are genuinely different?
Prompt Factories Summary
Prompt factories use meta-prompting to generate candidate prompts at scale:
- Variant factory: generate N diverse variants for A/B testing
- Template factory: generate parameterized templates from task descriptions
- Persona factory: full persona definitions including system prompts and examples
- Test case factory: generate typical, edge case, and adversarial test inputs
- Few-shot factory: generate input-output example pairs at specified difficulty levels
- Scoring meta-prompt: rank generated candidates before live testing
- Diversity requirement: specify different approaches to prevent near-identical variants
Frequently asked questions
Is the “Prompts That Generate Prompts” lesson free?
Yes — the full text of “Prompts That Generate Prompts” is free to read here on the web, and the AI Prompt Engineering course includes 4 lessons in total. To practise it interactively (a built-in code editor and a 24/7 AI tutor) and unlock the rest of the AI Prompt Engineering course, upgrade to CoddyKit PRO.
What will I learn in “Prompts That Generate Prompts”?
System prompt generators, persona generators, and task-specific prompt factories. You practise AI Prompt Engineering with hands-on code you run directly in the browser, and a 24/7 AI tutor answers your questions as you work through the lesson.
Do I need any experience to start AI Prompt Engineering?
No prior experience is required. AI Prompt Engineering on CoddyKit is structured for beginners through advanced learners; this is — lesson 2 of 4, so you can start here or from the beginning and move at your own pace.
How long does the “Prompts That Generate Prompts” lesson take?
Most CoddyKit lessons take about 5–10 minutes. Each one is bite-sized and interactive, so you make steady progress and pick up exactly where you left off across the web and the app.
Can I write and run code in this AI Prompt Engineering lesson?
Yes. Every AI Prompt Engineering lesson includes a built-in code editor, so you write and run real code right in your browser and get instant AI feedback — no local setup required.
All lessons in this course
- What Is Meta-Prompting?
- Prompts That Generate Prompts
- Self-Improving Prompt Systems
- Evaluation and Selection in Self-Improvement