事件作为事实来源与仅追加日志
用不可变事件流替代可变状态,并通过重放事件重建状态。
事件作为事实来源与仅追加日志 是 CoddyKit 上的免费 Node.js Backend Development Bootcamp 课时。 这是第 1 节课,共 4 节。 你可以在下方免费阅读本课时的完整内容 — 然后在浏览器中使用内置代码编辑器和全天候 AI 导师进行实践。 这是 Node.js Backend Development Bootcamp 学习路径的一部分,你的进度在网页和 CoddyKit 应用中同步。 Node.js Backend Development Bootcamp 课程共包含 4 节课。
本课时的部分内容尚未翻译,以英文显示。
The Problem with Mutable State
In a classic CRUD backend, you store the current state of an entity and overwrite it on every change. A user's balance is one row; when money moves, you UPDATE the number in place.
This is convenient but lossy. Once you overwrite the old value, the history is gone. You cannot answer:
- How did the balance reach this value?
- When and why did each change happen?
- What did the state look like last Tuesday?
Event Sourcing flips this: instead of storing the latest state, you store the sequence of facts that produced it.
// Classic mutable CRUD: history is destroyed on every write
let account = { id: 'acc-1', balance: 100 };
function deposit(amount) {
account.balance += amount; // old value is gone forever
}
function withdraw(amount) {
account.balance -= amount; // no record of why or when
}
deposit(50);
withdraw(30);
console.log(account); // { id: 'acc-1', balance: 120 }
// We know the result, but not the journey.Events as the Source of Truth
In Event Sourcing, an event is an immutable record of something that already happened. Events are named in the past tense: MoneyDeposited, MoneyWithdrawn, AccountOpened.
The event log becomes the source of truth. The current state is no longer stored directly — it is a derived value you compute by replaying events.
- Events are facts: they cannot be changed or deleted.
- State is an opinion: a projection of the facts at a point in time.
Each event captures intent and context, not just the resulting number.
// An event is an immutable, past-tense fact
const events = [
{ type: 'AccountOpened', data: { accountId: 'acc-1', owner: 'Ada' }, at: '2026-01-01T09:00:00Z' },
{ type: 'MoneyDeposited', data: { accountId: 'acc-1', amount: 50 }, at: '2026-01-02T10:15:00Z' },
{ type: 'MoneyWithdrawn', data: { accountId: 'acc-1', amount: 30 }, at: '2026-01-03T11:30:00Z' }
];
// Each entry is a fact that already happened. Nothing is overwritten.
console.log(`Stored ${events.length} immutable facts.`);The Append-Only Log
The store that holds events is an append-only log. There are only two real operations:
- Append a new event to the end.
- Read events in order, usually for a given stream (e.g. one account).
There is no UPDATE and no DELETE. This single constraint gives you a complete, ordered, tamper-evident audit trail for free.
Because the log is ordered, the position (or version) of each event matters: replaying in the same order always yields the same state.
// A minimal in-memory append-only log
class EventLog {
constructor() { this.events = []; }
append(event) {
// Only ever push to the end — never mutate or remove
const stored = { ...event, position: this.events.length + 1 };
this.events.push(Object.freeze(stored));
return stored;
}
read() {
return [...this.events]; // ordered copy
}
}
const log = new EventLog();
log.append({ type: 'AccountOpened', data: { accountId: 'acc-1' } });
log.append({ type: 'MoneyDeposited', data: { accountId: 'acc-1', amount: 50 } });
console.log(log.read());Reconstructing State by Replaying
If state is derived, how do we get it back? We replay: start from an empty state and apply each event in order. This function is often called apply, evolve, or a reducer.
Notice the shape: (state, event) => newState. It is exactly a reducer — the same idea as Array.prototype.reduce.
- The reducer is pure: same events in, same state out.
- It handles each event type and returns a new state object.
function applyEvent(state, event) {
switch (event.type) {
case 'AccountOpened':
return { id: event.data.accountId, owner: event.data.owner, balance: 0 };
case 'MoneyDeposited':
return { ...state, balance: state.balance + event.data.amount };
case 'MoneyWithdrawn':
return { ...state, balance: state.balance - event.data.amount };
default:
return state; // ignore unknown events
}
}
const events = [
{ type: 'AccountOpened', data: { accountId: 'acc-1', owner: 'Ada' } },
{ type: 'MoneyDeposited', data: { amount: 50 } },
{ type: 'MoneyWithdrawn', data: { amount: 30 } }
];
const state = events.reduce(applyEvent, null);
console.log(state); // { id: 'acc-1', owner: 'Ada', balance: 20 }Streams and Aggregates
You rarely replay every event in the system. Events are grouped into streams, one per entity — for example account-acc-1. The entity reconstructed from a stream is called an aggregate.
To load an aggregate:
- Read only that stream's events (filtered by
streamId). - Replay them through the reducer.
- Return the resulting in-memory state.
Keeping streams small keeps replay fast and keeps consistency boundaries clear.
function loadAggregate(allEvents, streamId, reducer) {
return allEvents
.filter(e => e.streamId === streamId)
.sort((a, b) => a.position - b.position)
.reduce(reducer, null);
}
const allEvents = [
{ streamId: 'account-acc-1', position: 1, type: 'AccountOpened', data: { accountId: 'acc-1', owner: 'Ada' } },
{ streamId: 'account-acc-2', position: 1, type: 'AccountOpened', data: { accountId: 'acc-2', owner: 'Lin' } },
{ streamId: 'account-acc-1', position: 2, type: 'MoneyDeposited', data: { amount: 75 } }
];
const reducer = (s, e) => {
if (e.type === 'AccountOpened') return { id: e.data.accountId, balance: 0 };
if (e.type === 'MoneyDeposited') return { ...s, balance: s.balance + e.data.amount };
return s;
};
console.log(loadAggregate(allEvents, 'account-acc-1', reducer));Commands vs Events
A crucial distinction: a command is a request to do something (it may be rejected); an event is the record that it happened (it cannot be undone).
Withdrawis a command — imperative, present tense, may fail.MoneyWithdrawnis an event — past tense, a settled fact.
The aggregate's job is to take the current state plus a command, run business rules, and decide which event(s) to append — or reject the command entirely.
function decide(state, command) {
switch (command.type) {
case 'Withdraw':
if (command.amount > state.balance) {
throw new Error('Insufficient funds'); // command rejected
}
return [{ type: 'MoneyWithdrawn', data: { amount: command.amount } }];
case 'Deposit':
return [{ type: 'MoneyDeposited', data: { amount: command.amount } }];
default:
throw new Error('Unknown command: ' + command.type);
}
}
const state = { balance: 40 };
console.log(decide(state, { type: 'Withdraw', amount: 30 }));
try { decide(state, { type: 'Withdraw', amount: 100 }); }
catch (e) { console.log('Rejected:', e.message); }The Decide / Evolve Cycle
Put the pieces together and you get the core write flow of an event-sourced aggregate:
- Load: replay the stream to rebuild current state.
- Decide: run the command against that state to produce new events.
- Append: write the new events to the log.
- Evolve: the same reducer that loaded state also keeps it current.
The decide function never writes; the evolve reducer never validates. This separation keeps the domain logic clean and testable.
function evolve(state, event) {
if (event.type === 'MoneyDeposited') return { ...state, balance: state.balance + event.data.amount };
if (event.type === 'MoneyWithdrawn') return { ...state, balance: state.balance - event.data.amount };
return state;
}
function decide(state, cmd) {
if (cmd.type === 'Deposit') return [{ type: 'MoneyDeposited', data: { amount: cmd.amount } }];
if (cmd.type === 'Withdraw' && cmd.amount <= state.balance)
return [{ type: 'MoneyWithdrawn', data: { amount: cmd.amount } }];
throw new Error('Invalid command');
}
let history = [{ type: 'MoneyDeposited', data: { amount: 100 } }];
let state = history.reduce(evolve, { balance: 0 }); // load
const newEvents = decide(state, { type: 'Withdraw', amount: 60 }); // decide
history = [...history, ...newEvents]; // append
state = newEvents.reduce(evolve, state); // evolve
console.log(state); // { balance: 40 }Optimistic Concurrency with Expected Version
Two requests may try to change the same aggregate at once. Because the log is append-only, we guard writes with the expected version: the position the writer believes the stream is at.
When appending, you say "I expect this stream to be at version N." If another writer already advanced it, the append fails and the caller retries by reloading.
- No locks held across the request.
- Conflicts are detected, never silently lost.
class VersionedStore {
constructor() { this.streams = new Map(); }
append(streamId, expectedVersion, newEvents) {
const current = this.streams.get(streamId) || [];
if (current.length !== expectedVersion) {
throw new Error(
`Concurrency conflict: expected v${expectedVersion}, got v${current.length}`
);
}
this.streams.set(streamId, [...current, ...newEvents]);
return current.length + newEvents.length;
}
}
const store = new VersionedStore();
store.append('acc-1', 0, [{ type: 'AccountOpened' }]); // ok -> v1
try {
store.append('acc-1', 0, [{ type: 'MoneyDeposited' }]); // stale version
} catch (e) { console.log(e.message); }
store.append('acc-1', 1, [{ type: 'MoneyDeposited' }]); // correct -> v2
console.log('Final version:', store.streams.get('acc-1').length);Snapshots: Replay Without Re-reading Everything
Replaying thousands of events on every load gets slow. A snapshot is a cached copy of the aggregate state at a known version. To load, you start from the snapshot and only replay events after it.
Important: snapshots are an optimization, not a source of truth. You can delete every snapshot and still rebuild perfect state from the events. The log remains authoritative.
- Store snapshot + the version it represents.
- On load: hydrate from snapshot, then replay the tail.
function loadWithSnapshot(snapshot, events, evolve) {
// snapshot = { state, version } or null
let state = snapshot ? snapshot.state : { balance: 0 };
const fromVersion = snapshot ? snapshot.version : 0;
return events
.filter(e => e.position > fromVersion)
.reduce(evolve, state);
}
const evolve = (s, e) =>
e.type === 'MoneyDeposited' ? { balance: s.balance + e.data.amount } : s;
const events = [
{ position: 1, type: 'MoneyDeposited', data: { amount: 100 } },
{ position: 2, type: 'MoneyDeposited', data: { amount: 50 } },
{ position: 3, type: 'MoneyDeposited', data: { amount: 25 } }
];
const snapshot = { state: { balance: 150 }, version: 2 };
console.log(loadWithSnapshot(snapshot, events, evolve)); // { balance: 175 }Schema Evolution and Upcasting
Events live forever, so their shape will outlive the code that wrote them. You can never edit an old event in place, but the new code must still understand it.
The standard tool is upcasting: a function that transforms an old event version into the current shape at read time, before it reaches the reducer.
- Add a
versionfield to each event type. - Provide new fields with sensible defaults; rename via the upcaster.
- Never mutate stored events — transform a copy on the way in.
// v1 had `amount` (cents implied); v2 adds explicit `currency`
function upcast(event) {
if (event.type === 'MoneyDeposited' && (event.version || 1) === 1) {
return {
...event,
version: 2,
data: { ...event.data, currency: 'USD' } // default for legacy events
};
}
return event;
}
const legacy = { type: 'MoneyDeposited', data: { amount: 50 } };
console.log(upcast(legacy));
// { type: 'MoneyDeposited', data: { amount: 50, currency: 'USD' }, version: 2 }Persisting the Log in Node.js
In production the append-only log is backed by durable storage: a dedicated store like EventStoreDB, or a relational table used as a log. A typical Postgres design:
- One
eventstable with(stream_id, version, type, data jsonb, recorded_at). - A unique constraint on
(stream_id, version)— this is what enforces optimistic concurrency at the database level. - Inserts only; the application code never issues
UPDATEorDELETEon it.
The same load/decide/append cycle runs on top, just with SQL behind the store interface.
// Sketch of an append against a Postgres-backed log (pg client `db`).
// The UNIQUE (stream_id, version) constraint rejects concurrent duplicates.
async function appendEvents(db, streamId, expectedVersion, events) {
const client = await db.connect();
try {
await client.query('BEGIN');
let version = expectedVersion;
for (const e of events) {
version += 1;
await client.query(
`INSERT INTO events (stream_id, version, type, data)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4)`,
[streamId, version, e.type, JSON.stringify(e.data)]
);
}
await client.query('COMMIT');
return version;
} catch (err) {
await client.query('ROLLBACK'); // unique violation => concurrency conflict
throw err;
} finally {
client.release();
}
}Quick Check
Consider an event-sourced account aggregate.
Recap
You replaced mutable state with an immutable event stream:
- Events are past-tense, immutable facts; the append-only log that holds them is the source of truth.
- State is derived, not stored — you rebuild it by replaying events through a pure reducer:
(state, event) => newState. - Events are grouped into streams, one per aggregate.
- The write cycle is load → decide → append → evolve; commands may be rejected, events never are.
- Expected version gives optimistic concurrency; a
UNIQUE(stream_id, version)constraint enforces it in the database. - Snapshots speed up replay but are optional; upcasting keeps old events readable as schemas evolve.
Next, you'll build read models (projections) and complete the CQRS picture.
常见问题解答
「事件作为事实来源与仅追加日志」课时是免费的吗?
是的 — 「事件作为事实来源与仅追加日志」的完整文本可在网页上免费阅读。要进行交互式练习(内置代码编辑器和全天候 AI 导师)并解锁 Node.js Backend Development Bootcamp 课程的其余内容,请升级到 CoddyKit PRO。 Node.js Backend Development Bootcamp 课程共包含 4 节课。
「事件作为事实来源与仅追加日志」这节课中我会学到什么?
用不可变事件流替代可变状态,并通过重放事件重建状态。 你通过在浏览器中直接运行的动手代码来练习 Node.js Backend Development Bootcamp,全天候 AI 导师会在你学习这节课的过程中回答你的问题。
学习 Node.js Backend Development Bootcamp 需要有经验吗?
无需任何先前经验。CoddyKit 上的 Node.js Backend Development Bootcamp 课程适合初学者到高级学习者,你可以从这里开始或从头开始,按照自己的节奏学习。 这是第 1 节课,共 4 节。
「事件作为事实来源与仅追加日志」课时需要多长时间?
大多数 CoddyKit 课程大约需要 5–10 分钟。每节课都很精短且互动,所以你能稳步进步,并在网页和应用中从离开的地方继续。
我能在这节 Node.js Backend Development Bootcamp 课中编写并运行代码吗?
能。每节 Node.js Backend Development Bootcamp 课都包含内置代码编辑器,你可以在浏览器中直接编写并运行真实代码,并获得即时 AI 反馈 — 无需本地设置。
此课程中的所有课时
- 事件作为事实来源与仅追加日志
- 聚合、命令与领域事件建模
- 构建读取模型与投影
- 快照、版本控制与事件模式演进