0Pricing
Tailwind CSS Academy · レッスン

デザインシステムの計画

トークンの分類、コンポーネント一覧、使用するドキュメント作成ツールなど、デザインシステムの対象範囲を定義します。

「デザインシステムの計画」はCoddyKit上の無料Tailwind CSS Academyレッスンです。 これはレッスン1/4です。 下記で完全なレッスンを無料で読むことができます。その後、ブラウザ内の組み込みコードエディタと24時間対応のAIチューターでハンズオン演習できます。 これはTailwind CSS Academy学習パスの一部であり、ウェブとCoddyKitアプリ全体で進捗が同期されます。 Tailwind CSS Academyコースには全4レッスンが含まれています。

このレッスンの一部はまだ翻訳されておらず、英語で表示されています。

What Is a Design System

A design system is a collection of reusable components, design tokens, guidelines, and documentation that enables teams to build consistent user interfaces efficiently. In a Tailwind context, the design system includes the token configuration in tailwind.config.js, a library of styled components, written conventions, and documentation tooling so the whole team uses the system rather than reinventing solutions.

Defining the System Scope

Before writing any code, define the scope of your design system. Answer three questions: Which products does it serve? (one app, multiple apps, third-party consumers). Which component categories does it cover? (typography, forms, layout primitives, complex patterns). Who maintains it? (dedicated team, distributed contributors). Scope drives every subsequent decision about complexity and governance.

/* Design System Scope Document (example) */

Products:
  - Web marketing site
  - Admin dashboard
  - Mobile web app (responsive)

Component inventory:
  - Primitives: Button, Input, Badge, Icon
  - Layout: Stack, Grid, Container
  - Composite: Card, Modal, Dropdown, Toast
  - Complex: DataTable, DatePicker, Combobox

Maintainers:
  - Design System team (2 engineers, 1 designer)
  - Contributors: any engineer via PR

Token Taxonomy Planning

Design tokens are the atomic values the system is built from. Plan a two-tier taxonomy: primitive tokens are raw values (like blue-500: #3b82f6), and semantic tokens are purpose-driven references (like color.primary: blue-500). Semantic tokens are what components consume; primitive tokens are what semantic tokens reference. This indirection enables theme switching without touching components.

/* Token taxonomy plan */

/* Tier 1 — Primitives (raw values) */
/* color.blue.500 = #3b82f6 */
/* color.red.500  = #ef4444 */
/* spacing.4      = 1rem    */

/* Tier 2 — Semantic tokens (purpose-driven) */
/* color.primary     = color.blue.500 */
/* color.danger      = color.red.500  */
/* color.surface     = color.white    */
/* spacing.component = spacing.4      */

Choosing Documentation Tooling

Pick your documentation approach early because it shapes how you write components. Common options: Storybook for interactive component sandboxes and visual regression testing, Docusaurus for written documentation with code samples, or a custom Next.js documentation site using your own design system (eating your own dog food). Each has trade-offs in setup cost and maintenance burden.

/* Documentation tool comparison */

Storybook:
  + Visual sandbox for every component
  + Addon ecosystem (a11y, viewport, interactions)
  - Setup and maintenance overhead
  - Separate from your app, can drift

Custom docs site:
  + Uses your actual design system live
  + No tooling drift
  - More initial build work

Docusaurus:
  + Markdown-driven, easy to write
  - No interactive component sandbox by default

Component Inventory and Prioritization

List every component your products need and prioritize them by frequency of use and impact on consistency. Buttons appear everywhere — build them first. DataTables are used rarely and complex — defer until later iterations. A simple spreadsheet with columns for component name, priority (high/medium/low), and status (planned/in-progress/done) is sufficient to track the build-out.

/* Component inventory (simplified) */

Priority HIGH (build in sprint 1-2):
  Button, Input, Label, Badge, Icon, Spinner

Priority MEDIUM (sprint 3-4):
  Card, Modal, Dropdown, Toast, Tooltip, Avatar

Priority LOW (sprint 5+):
  DatePicker, Combobox, DataTable, RichTextEditor

Accessibility Standards Planning

Decide on your accessibility target level before building any components. WCAG 2.1 AA is the standard most organizations target. Document which ARIA patterns each component type must implement: buttons need type attributes, modals need focus trapping, dropdowns need role='listbox', etc. Including accessibility in the planning phase costs far less than retrofitting it later.

/* Accessibility checklist per component type */

Button:
  [ ] aria-label when icon-only
  [ ] disabled state with aria-disabled
  [ ] focus-visible ring

Modal:
  [ ] aria-modal + role='dialog'
  [ ] aria-labelledby pointing to title
  [ ] Focus trap on open
  [ ] Escape key closes
  [ ] Return focus to trigger on close

Dropdown:
  [ ] role='listbox' + aria-expanded on trigger
  [ ] role='option' + aria-selected on items
  [ ] Keyboard navigation (up/down/enter/escape)

Naming Conventions for Components

Establish naming conventions before writing a single component. Choose a style for component names (PascalCase), variant prop names (variant: primary | secondary | danger), and size prop names (size: sm | md | lg). Document this in your contributing guide so all contributors produce predictable, discoverable APIs without needing code review for naming disagreements.

/* Component API convention examples */

/* Variant prop: primary, secondary, ghost, danger */
<Button variant='primary'>Save</Button>
<Button variant='ghost'>Cancel</Button>

/* Size prop: sm, md, lg */
<Button size='sm'>Compact</Button>
<Button size='lg'>Large CTA</Button>

/* State props: boolean adjectives */
<Button loading={true}>Saving...</Button>
<Button disabled={true}>Unavailable</Button>

Planning the Repository Structure

Lay out the repository structure before coding. A typical design system package contains a src/components/ directory (one subfolder per component), a src/tokens/ directory, a src/index.ts barrel export, and a tailwind.config.js. Storybook stories live alongside their components in ComponentName.stories.tsx files for proximity.

packages/ui/
├── src/
│   ├── components/
│   │   ├── Button/
│   │   │   ├── Button.tsx
│   │   │   ├── Button.test.tsx
│   │   │   └── Button.stories.tsx
│   │   └── Card/
│   │       ├── Card.tsx
│   │       └── Card.stories.tsx
│   ├── tokens/
│   │   ├── colors.ts
│   │   └── typography.ts
│   └── index.ts      # barrel export
├── tailwind.config.js
└── package.json

Governance and Contribution Process

A design system without governance degrades into inconsistency. Define a contribution process: how engineers propose new components (RFC document or issue template), who reviews them (design system team + one other designer), and what the acceptance criteria are (WCAG AA, TypeScript types, Storybook story, unit test). Write this in a CONTRIBUTING.md at the package root.

# CONTRIBUTING.md

## Proposing a new component
1. Open a GitHub issue with the Component Proposal template
2. Tag @design-system-team for review
3. Await approval before implementing

## Component acceptance criteria
- [ ] TypeScript props with JSDoc
- [ ] All variants documented in Storybook
- [ ] WCAG AA accessibility (checked with axe-core)
- [ ] Unit tests for behavior
- [ ] Changelog entry

Versioning and Breaking Change Policy

Version the design system using Semantic Versioning: patch for bug fixes, minor for new components or additive changes, major for breaking changes to existing APIs. Publish a machine-readable changelog with each release. Establish a policy for how long deprecated APIs are supported before removal — typically two major versions — so consumers have time to migrate without being stranded.

/* Versioning policy */

Patch (1.0.x) — non-breaking:
  Bug fixes, accessibility improvements, style tweaks

Minor (1.x.0) — non-breaking:
  New components, new optional props, new variants

Major (x.0.0) — breaking:
  Removed props, renamed components, changed APIs
  Deprecate 2 minor versions before removal
  Provide codemod where possible

Design Handoff and Token Synchronization

Keep design tokens synchronized between your Figma files and the code. Tools like Style Dictionary or Tokens Studio can export Figma design tokens directly to a JSON format that populates the Tailwind config. This single source of truth prevents the classic scenario where designers update colors in Figma but the code still uses old hex values weeks later.

# Style Dictionary: transforms design tokens to Tailwind-compatible output

# tokens/raw/colors.json (from Figma export)
{
  "brand": {
    "blue": { "500": { "value": "#3b82f6" } }
  }
}

# After running Style Dictionary:
# tokens/tailwind/colors.js
module.exports = {
  brand: { blue: { 500: '#3b82f6' } }
};

# Consumed in tailwind.config.js:
colors: { ...require('./tokens/tailwind/colors') }

Quick Check

Test your understanding of Tailwind CSS Mastery concepts from this lesson.

Lesson Recap

In this lesson you learned: defining system scope including products, component inventory, and maintainership, planning a two-tier token taxonomy with primitive and semantic tokens, and establishing governance with contribution processes, versioning policy, and design-to-code token synchronization. Next up we implement the token and config layer.

よくある質問

「デザインシステムの計画」レッスンは無料ですか?

はい。「デザインシステムの計画」の完全なテキストはこのウェブで無料で読めます。インタラクティブに演習し(組み込みコードエディタと24時間対応のAIチューター)、Tailwind CSS Academyコースの残りをアンロックするには、CoddyKit PROにアップグレードしてください。 Tailwind CSS Academyコースには全4レッスンが含まれています。

「デザインシステムの計画」で何を学びますか?

トークンの分類、コンポーネント一覧、使用するドキュメント作成ツールなど、デザインシステムの対象範囲を定義します。 ブラウザで直接実行するハンズオンコードでTailwind CSS Academyを演習し、24時間対応のAIチューターがレッスンを進める中での質問に答えます。

Tailwind CSS Academyを始めるのに経験は必要ですか?

事前経験は必要ありません。CoddyKitのTailwind CSS Academyは初級者から上級者向けに構成されているため、ここから始めるか最初から始めて、自分のペースで進むことができます。 これはレッスン1/4です。

「デザインシステムの計画」レッスンにはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

ほとんどのCoddyKitレッスンは約5~10分かかります。各レッスンはコンパクトでインタラクティブなので、着実に進歩し、ウェブとアプリ全体で正確に前回の場所から再開できます。

このTailwind CSS Academyレッスンでコードを書いて実行できますか?

はい。すべてのTailwind CSS Academyレッスンに組み込みコードエディタが含まれているため、ブラウザでリアルコードを書いて実行し、即座のAIフィードバックを取得できます。ローカル設定は不要です。

このコースのすべてのレッスン

  1. デザインシステムの計画
  2. トークンと設定レイヤーの構築
  3. コンポーネントライブラリの構築
  4. ドキュメント作成とチームへの引き継ぎ
← Tailwind CSS Academyに戻る