0Pricing
Pandas & NumPy Academy · レッスン

インデックスによる並べ替え

sort_index()を使ってインデックスラベルに従って行を並べ替え、ソート済みインデックスによってパフォーマンスが向上する場面を理解します。

「インデックスによる並べ替え」はCoddyKit上の無料Pandas & NumPy Academyレッスンです。 これはレッスン2/4です。 下記で完全なレッスンを無料で読むことができます。その後、ブラウザ内の組み込みコードエディタと24時間対応のAIチューターでハンズオン演習できます。 これはPandas & NumPy Academy学習パスの一部であり、ウェブとCoddyKitアプリ全体で進捗が同期されます。 Pandas & NumPy Academyコースには全4レッスンが含まれています。

このレッスンの一部はまだ翻訳されておらず、英語で表示されています。

Understanding the DataFrame Index

Every Pandas DataFrame has a row index — a set of labels used to identify and access rows. By default, this is a RangeIndex (0, 1, 2, …), but you can set it to any column (dates, names, IDs) using set_index(). When the index is meaningful (e.g., a DatetimeIndex or a customer ID), sorting by it rather than by a column value produces a logically organised output.

import pandas as pd

df = pd.DataFrame(
    {'value': [10, 20, 30]},
    index=['C', 'A', 'B']  # out-of-order alphabetic index
)
print(df)
#    value
# C     10
# A     20
# B     30

sort_index() — Ascending

DataFrame.sort_index() reorders rows by their index label rather than by column values. By default, sorting is ascending — alphabetically for string indices, numerically for integer indices, and chronologically for DatetimeIndex. This is the standard way to restore a dataset to a natural order after shuffling or appending records out of sequence.

import pandas as pd

df = pd.DataFrame(
    {'temp': [22.5, 19.0, 25.1, 18.3]},
    index=pd.to_datetime(['2024-03-01', '2024-01-15', '2024-06-10', '2024-01-01'])
)

sorted_df = df.sort_index()
print(sorted_df)
#             temp
# 2024-01-01  18.3
# 2024-01-15  19.0
# 2024-03-01  22.5
# 2024-06-10  25.1

sort_index() Descending

Pass ascending=False to sort the index from largest (or latest) to smallest (or earliest). For a DatetimeIndex this puts the most recent observations at the top, which is the typical layout for financial data, log files, and event streams where the latest event is most relevant.

import pandas as pd

df = pd.DataFrame(
    {'price': [100, 110, 105, 115]},
    index=pd.to_datetime(['2024-01', '2024-02', '2024-03', '2024-04'])
)

# Most recent first
print(df.sort_index(ascending=False))
#             price
# 2024-04-30    115
# 2024-03-31    105
# 2024-02-29    110
# 2024-01-31    100

Sorting Column Labels with axis=1

By default, sort_index() sorts the row index (axis=0). Pass axis=1 to sort the column labels alphabetically instead. This is useful for standardising wide DataFrames with many columns so columns appear in a predictable alphabetical order, making it easier to visually find a column or compare DataFrames.

import pandas as pd

df = pd.DataFrame({
    'zebra': [1], 'apple': [2], 'mango': [3], 'banana': [4]
})

print('Before:', df.columns.tolist())
# ['zebra', 'apple', 'mango', 'banana']

sorted_cols = df.sort_index(axis=1)
print('After:', sorted_cols.columns.tolist())
# ['apple', 'banana', 'mango', 'zebra']

When is a Sorted Index Faster?

Pandas can use binary search for label look-ups when the index is sorted (monotonic). A sorted index makes .loc['2024-01':'2024-06'] slices O(log n) instead of O(n). The method is_monotonic_increasing (or is_monotonic_decreasing) returns a boolean indicating whether the index is already sorted. Sorting a large index before slicing repeatedly is a worthwhile one-time cost.

import pandas as pd
import numpy as np

idx = pd.to_datetime(['2024-03-01', '2024-01-15', '2024-06-10'])
df = pd.DataFrame({'v': [1, 2, 3]}, index=idx)

print('Sorted?', df.index.is_monotonic_increasing)  # False

df = df.sort_index()
print('Sorted?', df.index.is_monotonic_increasing)  # True

# Now slicing is efficient
print(df.loc['2024-01':'2024-03'])

sort_index() with MultiIndex

When a DataFrame has a MultiIndex (hierarchical row index), sort_index() sorts all levels in the hierarchy by default. You can restrict sorting to specific levels with the level parameter. A sorted MultiIndex is required for efficient hierarchical slicing with .loc[(outer, inner), :].

import pandas as pd

arrays = [
    ['B', 'B', 'A', 'A'],
    ['two', 'one', 'two', 'one']
]
idx = pd.MultiIndex.from_arrays(arrays, names=['first', 'second'])
df = pd.DataFrame({'value': [10, 20, 30, 40]}, index=idx)

print(df.sort_index())
#               value
# first second
# A     one       40
#       two       30
# B     one       20
#       two       10

Sorting Only One Level of MultiIndex

With a MultiIndex, you may want to sort on only the inner or outer level while keeping the other level's order intact. Pass level= to sort_index() — it accepts an integer (level position), a string (level name), or a list. This is useful when the outer level order is already correct and you only need to sort within each group.

import pandas as pd

df = pd.DataFrame({
    'sales': [300, 100, 200, 400, 150, 250]
}, index=pd.MultiIndex.from_tuples([
    ('Eng', 'Dave'), ('Eng', 'Alice'), ('Eng', 'Bob'),
    ('HR', 'Zoe'), ('HR', 'Carol'), ('HR', 'Eve')
], names=['dept', 'name']))

# Sort only the 'name' level alphabetically within each dept
print(df.sort_index(level='name'))
#              sales
# dept name
# Eng  Alice    100
#      Bob      200
#      Dave     300
# HR   Carol    150
#      Eve      250
#      Zoe      400

Difference Between sort_index() and sort_values()

It is important to distinguish the two sort methods. sort_values(by='col') reorders rows based on the data values in a column. sort_index() reorders rows based on the row label (the index), which may or may not correspond to any column. When the index is the primary identifier (e.g., a DatetimeIndex or a meaningful string key), sort_index() is the right choice.

import pandas as pd

df = pd.DataFrame(
    {'value': [30, 10, 20]},
    index=['C', 'A', 'B']
)

# sort_index: sorted by row label A, B, C
print(df.sort_index())
#    value
# A     10
# B     20
# C     30

# sort_values: sorted by data value 10, 20, 30
print(df.sort_values('value'))
#    value
# A     10
# B     20
# C     30
# (same here because values happen to match alphabetical label order!)

Restoring Original Order After Ops

Some operations (shuffling, random sampling with df.sample(frac=1)) scramble the row order. sort_index() is the clean way to restore the original sequential order. If the original order was a RangeIndex (0, 1, 2, …), sort_index() restores it; if it was a meaningful label, it restores that label's natural ordering.

import pandas as pd

df = pd.DataFrame({'x': [10, 20, 30, 40, 50]})

# Shuffle (random sample)
shuffled = df.sample(frac=1, random_state=42)
print('Shuffled index:', shuffled.index.tolist())
# e.g. [2, 4, 0, 1, 3]

# Restore original order by sorting the index
restored = shuffled.sort_index()
print('Restored index:', restored.index.tolist())
# [0, 1, 2, 3, 4]

sort_index() with na_position

Like sort_values(), sort_index() also supports na_position for controlling where NaN index labels appear. This matters when a DataFrame has a string or date index that contains some NaN labels (possible after operations that introduce missing index values). The default is 'last'.

import pandas as pd
import numpy as np

df = pd.DataFrame(
    {'v': [1, 2, 3, 4]},
    index=['B', None, 'A', 'C']
)

print(df.sort_index(na_position='last'))
#      v
# A    3
# B    1
# C    4
# NaN  2

Performance Gain Measurement

You can empirically measure the performance benefit of a sorted index by using Python's timeit to compare a slice on an unsorted vs. sorted DatetimeIndex. The sorted case uses binary search and is typically 5-20x faster for large DataFrames. This demonstrates why sort_index() is not just a cosmetic operation — it has real runtime implications.

import pandas as pd
import numpy as np

np.random.seed(0)
random_dates = pd.to_datetime(
    pd.Timestamp('2020-01-01').value + np.random.randint(0, 1_000_000_000_000_000, size=100_000),
    unit='ns'
)
df = pd.DataFrame({'val': np.random.randn(100_000)}, index=random_dates)

# Without sort: O(n) scan
import timeit
t1 = timeit.timeit(lambda: df.loc['2022-01':'2022-06'], number=100)

df_sorted = df.sort_index()
t2 = timeit.timeit(lambda: df_sorted.loc['2022-01':'2022-06'], number=100)

print(f'Unsorted: {t1:.3f}s, Sorted: {t2:.3f}s, Speedup: {t1/t2:.1f}x')

Quick Check

Test your understanding of sorting by index in Pandas.

Lesson Recap

In this lesson you learned: sort_index() reorders rows by their label (not column values), axis=1 sorts column labels alphabetically, and a sorted index enables binary search making time-based slicing much faster. For MultiIndex DataFrames, level= restricts sorting to one hierarchy level. Always check is_monotonic_increasing before relying on efficient slice lookups. Next up we rank values within a column.

よくある質問

「インデックスによる並べ替え」レッスンは無料ですか?

はい。「インデックスによる並べ替え」の完全なテキストはこのウェブで無料で読めます。インタラクティブに演習し(組み込みコードエディタと24時間対応のAIチューター)、Pandas & NumPy Academyコースの残りをアンロックするには、CoddyKit PROにアップグレードしてください。 Pandas & NumPy Academyコースには全4レッスンが含まれています。

「インデックスによる並べ替え」で何を学びますか?

sort_index()を使ってインデックスラベルに従って行を並べ替え、ソート済みインデックスによってパフォーマンスが向上する場面を理解します。 ブラウザで直接実行するハンズオンコードでPandas & NumPy Academyを演習し、24時間対応のAIチューターがレッスンを進める中での質問に答えます。

Pandas & NumPy Academyを始めるのに経験は必要ですか?

事前経験は必要ありません。CoddyKitのPandas & NumPy Academyは初級者から上級者向けに構成されているため、ここから始めるか最初から始めて、自分のペースで進むことができます。 これはレッスン2/4です。

「インデックスによる並べ替え」レッスンにはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

ほとんどのCoddyKitレッスンは約5~10分かかります。各レッスンはコンパクトでインタラクティブなので、着実に進歩し、ウェブとアプリ全体で正確に前回の場所から再開できます。

このPandas & NumPy Academyレッスンでコードを書いて実行できますか?

はい。すべてのPandas & NumPy Academyレッスンに組み込みコードエディタが含まれているため、ブラウザでリアルコードを書いて実行し、即座のAIフィードバックを取得できます。ローカル設定は不要です。

このコースのすべてのレッスン

  1. 列の値による並べ替え
  2. インデックスによる並べ替え
  3. 値の順位付け
  4. インデックスの設定とリセット
← Pandas & NumPy Academyに戻る