0Pricing
Claude Architect · Pelajaran

Rahasia dengan Variabel Lingkungan

Referensikan ${GITHUB_TOKEN}; jangan pernah memasukkan token ke repositori.

Rahasia dengan Variabel Lingkungan adalah pelajaran Claude Architect gratis di CoddyKit. Ini adalah pelajaran 3 dari 4. Kamu bisa membaca pelajaran lengkapnya di bawah secara gratis — lalu praktikkan langsung di browser dengan editor kode bawaan dan tutor AI 24/7. Ini adalah bagian dari jalur belajar Claude Architect, dan progresmu tersinkronisasi di web dan aplikasi CoddyKit. Kursus Claude Architect mencakup 4 pelajaran total.

Bagian dari pelajaran ini belum diterjemahkan dan ditampilkan dalam bahasa Inggris.

Why Secrets Don't Belong in Config

MCP servers connect Claude to real systems — GitHub, databases, internal APIs. Each connection needs credentials: tokens, API keys, passwords.

The architect's rule is absolute: secrets never live in committed files. Your .mcp.json (project scope, shared in version control) declares which servers exist and how to launch them — but a raw token written there is now in your git history forever.

The clean pattern is to reference a secret by environment-variable name and let the runtime resolve it. This lesson shows how MCP does exactly that with ${GITHUB_TOKEN}.

The Two MCP Scopes

MCP configuration lives in two distinct scopes, and the distinction drives where secrets are safe:

  • Project scope — .mcp.json at the repo root. Shared via VCS so the whole team gets the same servers.
  • User scope — ~/.claude.json. Personal, on your machine only, NOT shared.

Because project scope is committed, anything you put in .mcp.json is visible to everyone with repo access — including a leaked clone. That is precisely why a token's value must never appear there; only a reference to an env var may.

Referencing a Secret with ${VAR}

In .mcp.json you pass credentials through the server's env block, using ${VAR} expansion. The literal text ${GITHUB_TOKEN} is committed safely — the real token is resolved from the environment at launch time.

Here the GitHub MCP server receives its token without the secret ever touching the file.

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "github": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-github"],
      "env": {
        "GITHUB_PERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKEN": "${GITHUB_TOKEN}"
      }
    }
  }
}

Where the Real Value Comes From

The reference ${GITHUB_TOKEN} is inert until the runtime supplies the actual value. You provide it through your shell environment — typically from a local, git-ignored .env file or your OS secret store.

The token is set outside the repo. The committed config stays clean; each developer (and each CI runner) injects their own value.

# .env — git-ignored, never committed
export GITHUB_TOKEN="ghp_realSecretValueLivesOnlyHere"

# load it into the shell before launching Claude Code
source .env

Lock the Door: .gitignore

Referencing an env var is only half the defense. You must also guarantee the file holding the real value never gets committed.

Add your secret files to .gitignore. Commit an example file with placeholder names so teammates know which variables to set — without ever shipping the values.

# .gitignore
.env
.env.local
*.secret

# .env.example  (THIS one is committed — names only, no values)
GITHUB_TOKEN=
DATABASE_URL=

Personal vs Shared Secrets

Scope also decides whose credential is used:

  • A shared service token the whole team uses can be referenced in project .mcp.json — each member still supplies the value via their own environment.
  • A purely personal token (your individual PAT) fits naturally with user scope ~/.claude.json, which isn't shared anyway.

Either way the principle holds: the file may contain the name; the environment supplies the value. Never invert that.

Prefer Community MCP Servers

For standard integrations — GitHub, Postgres, Slack, filesystem — prefer a maintained community MCP server over a custom one. They already implement the env-based secret handling correctly, expose proper Tools/Resources/Prompts, and return structured errors.

Writing your own server just to call GitHub means re-implementing auth and token handling you could inherit safely. Reserve custom servers for genuinely proprietary systems.

Secrets in CI/CD

In a pipeline there is no developer .env to source. Instead, your CI platform's encrypted secret store injects the variable into the job environment, and the same ${GITHUB_TOKEN} reference resolves identically.

This is why the reference pattern matters: one committed .mcp.json works locally and in CI, with the value sourced differently in each place — and never printed.

# GitHub Actions — value comes from encrypted repo secrets
jobs:
  review:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    env:
      GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
    steps:
      - run: claude -p "/review" --output-format json

Least Privilege for Tokens

An MCP token inherits whatever permissions you granted it. A GitHub PAT scoped to repo can push code; one scoped to read:org cannot.

Mirror the architect's least-privilege habit from tool and subagent design: grant each token only the scopes its server actually needs. If ${GITHUB_TOKEN} ever leaks despite your safeguards, a tightly scoped, short-lived token limits the blast radius dramatically.

Rotation and Leak Response

Treat any committed secret as compromised — even after you delete it, it remains in git history. The only real fix is to revoke and rotate the credential at its source (GitHub settings), then re-issue a fresh one into your environment.

Because your config references ${GITHUB_TOKEN} rather than embedding a value, rotation is painless: revoke the old token, update the env var, relaunch. No code change, no commit.

# After rotating the token at the provider, just update the env value:
export GITHUB_TOKEN="ghp_freshlyRotatedValue"
# .mcp.json still references ${GITHUB_TOKEN} — nothing else changes

Putting It Together

The complete, exam-grade pattern for MCP secrets:

  • Declare the server in project .mcp.json (shared via VCS).
  • Reference the secret as ${GITHUB_TOKEN} in the env block — never the raw value.
  • Supply the value from a git-ignored .env locally and from an encrypted store in CI.
  • Ignore secret files; commit only an .env.example of names.
  • Scope tokens to least privilege and rotate on any suspicion.

Config is shareable; secrets are not. That separation is the whole game.

Quick Check: Sharing an MCP Config

Apply the secret-handling rules to a real team scenario.

Recap: Secrets with Environment Variables

Key takeaways:

  • MCP config has two scopes: project .mcp.json (shared via VCS) and user ~/.claude.json (personal).
  • Committed config may hold a reference like ${GITHUB_TOKEN} — never the token value.
  • Real values come from a git-ignored .env locally and an encrypted secret store in CI; commit only an .env.example of names.
  • Prefer community MCP servers — they handle env-based secrets correctly out of the box.
  • Scope tokens to least privilege; on any leak, revoke and rotate at the source — the reference pattern makes rotation a one-line env change.

Separate the shareable from the secret, and you've internalized the rule the exam is testing.

Pertanyaan yang Sering Diajukan

Apakah pelajaran “Rahasia dengan Variabel Lingkungan” gratis?

Ya — teks lengkap “Rahasia dengan Variabel Lingkungan” gratis dibaca di sini di web. Untuk praktiknya secara interaktif (editor kode bawaan dan tutor AI 24/7) dan buka sisa kursus Claude Architect, upgrade ke CoddyKit PRO. Kursus Claude Architect mencakup 4 pelajaran total.

Apa yang akan aku pelajari di “Rahasia dengan Variabel Lingkungan”?

Referensikan ${GITHUB_TOKEN}; jangan pernah memasukkan token ke repositori. Kamu berlatih Claude Architect dengan kode praktik yang langsung kamu jalankan di browser, dan tutor AI 24/7 menjawab pertanyaanmu saat kamu mengerjakan pelajaran ini.

Apakah aku perlu pengalaman untuk memulai Claude Architect?

Tidak diperlukan pengalaman sebelumnya. Claude Architect di CoddyKit dirancang untuk pemula hingga pelajar tingkat lanjut, jadi kamu bisa memulai di sini atau dari awal dan belajar sesuai kecepatan kamu sendiri. Ini adalah pelajaran 3 dari 4.

Berapa lama pelajaran “Rahasia dengan Variabel Lingkungan” memakan waktu?

Sebagian besar pelajaran CoddyKit memakan waktu sekitar 5–10 menit. Setiap pelajaran ringkas dan interaktif, jadi kamu membuat kemajuan stabil dan melanjutkan dari tempat kamu tinggalkan di web dan aplikasi.

Bisakah aku menulis dan menjalankan kode dalam pelajaran Claude Architect ini?

Ya. Setiap pelajaran Claude Architect menyertakan editor kode bawaan, jadi kamu menulis dan menjalankan kode nyata langsung di browser dan mendapatkan umpan balik AI instan — tidak diperlukan penyiapan lokal.

Semua pelajaran dalam kursus ini

  1. Alat, Sumber Daya, dan Perintah
  2. Cakupan Proyek vs Pengguna
  3. Rahasia dengan Variabel Lingkungan
  4. Server Komunitas vs Kustom
← Kembali ke Claude Architect