Modèles d’architecture sans serveur
Découvrez et appliquez des modèles d’architecture sans serveur courants, tels que la diffusion en éventail, le traitement dispersé-consolidé et la journalisation des événements, pour résoudre efficacement des problèmes métier complexes.
Modèles d’architecture sans serveur est une leçon Serverless AWS Lambda Development gratuite sur CoddyKit. Ceci est la leçon 3 sur 4. Tu peux lire la leçon complète ci-dessous gratuitement — puis la pratiquer en direct dans le navigateur avec un éditeur de code intégré et un tuteur IA 24/7. Elle fait partie du parcours d'apprentissage Serverless AWS Lambda Development, et ta progression se synchronise sur le web et l'application CoddyKit. Le cours Serverless AWS Lambda Development comprend 4 leçons au total.
Certaines parties de cette leçon n'ont pas encore été traduites et s'affichent en anglais.
What are Serverless Patterns?
In serverless development, we often encounter similar challenges. Architectural patterns are proven, reusable solutions to these common problems.
They help us design scalable, resilient, and maintainable serverless applications by providing a blueprint for interaction between different services.
The Fan-Out Pattern
The Fan-Out pattern is when a single input event triggers multiple parallel processes or actions. Think of it like a ripple effect from one stone thrown into water.
This pattern is excellent for decoupling services and performing concurrent tasks. For example, a new file upload might need to be processed in several different ways at once.
Fan-Out: Image Processing Example
Imagine uploading an image. A Lambda function could 'fan out' this event, triggering separate processes for creating a thumbnail, adding a watermark, and extracting metadata—all in parallel.
Here's a conceptual Python example simulating this fan-out logic:
def process_image_event(image_id):
print(f"Processing image: {image_id}")
# Simulate publishing to different services
print(f" - Publishing to Thumbnail Service for {image_id}")
print(f" - Publishing to Watermark Service for {image_id}")
print(f" - Publishing to Metadata Service for {image_id}")
def main():
print("--- Fan-Out Simulation ---")
image_id = "img-12345.jpg"
process_image_event(image_id)
print("--- Simulation Complete ---")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()The Scatter-Gather Pattern
The Scatter-Gather pattern involves sending a request to multiple recipients (scatter), collecting all their responses, and then aggregating them into a single response (gather).
This is often used for operations like searching across multiple data sources or comparing prices from different vendors.
Scatter-Gather: Product Search Example
When you search for a product, a Lambda could 'scatter' the query to various vendor APIs, then 'gather' and combine their results to show you the best options.
This example simulates querying different vendors and finding the cheapest product:
def get_product_info(vendor_name, product_id):
# Simulate calling a vendor API
print(f" - Querying {vendor_name} for product {product_id}...")
if vendor_name == "VendorA":
return {"vendor": "VendorA", "price": 100, "stock": 5}
elif vendor_name == "VendorB":
return {"vendor": "VendorB", "price": 95, "stock": 10}
elif vendor_name == "VendorC":
return {"vendor": "VendorC", "price": 110, "stock": 3}
return None
def main():
print("--- Scatter-Gather Simulation ---")
product_id = "PROD-XYZ"
vendors = ["VendorA", "VendorB", "VendorC"]
all_results = []
print(f"Searching for product {product_id} across vendors:")
for vendor in vendors:
result = get_product_info(vendor, product_id)
if result:
all_results.append(result)
print("\n--- Aggregated Results ---")
if all_results:
for res in all_results:
print(f" Vendor: {res['vendor']}, Price: ${res['price']}, Stock: {res['stock']}")
cheapest = min(all_results, key=lambda x: x['price'])
print(f"\nCheapest option: {cheapest['vendor']} at ${cheapest['price']}")
else:
print("No results found.")
print("--- Simulation Complete ---")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()The Event Sourcing Pattern
Event Sourcing is an architectural pattern where all changes to application state are stored as a sequence of immutable events. Instead of just storing the current state, you store how you got to that state.
This provides a complete audit trail, allows rebuilding past states, and is foundational for complex event-driven systems.
Event Sourcing: Order Management Example
In an e-commerce system, instead of updating an Order record, you record events like OrderCreated, ItemAdded, OrderShipped. The current state is then derived from applying these events in order.
Here's a simulation of recording events for an order:
import datetime
def record_event(event_type, payload):
timestamp = datetime.datetime.now().isoformat()
event = {
"eventId": f"evt-{datetime.datetime.now().timestamp()}",
"eventType": event_type,
"timestamp": timestamp,
"payload": payload
}
# In a real system, this would write to a database stream (e.g., DynamoDB Streams, Kinesis)
print(f"Recorded Event: {event['eventType']} at {event['timestamp']}")
print(f" Payload: {event['payload']}")
return event
def main():
print("--- Event Sourcing Simulation ---")
# Simulate an order creation
order_id = "ORD-001"
record_event("OrderCreated", {"orderId": order_id, "customer": "Alice", "initialItems": []})
# Simulate adding an item
record_event("ItemAdded", {"orderId": order_id, "itemId": "SKU-A", "quantity": 1})
# Simulate updating an item quantity
record_event("ItemQuantityUpdated", {"orderId": order_id, "itemId": "SKU-A", "newQuantity": 2})
# Simulate shipping the order
record_event("OrderShipped", {"orderId": order_id, "shippingProvider": "UPS"})
print("\n--- Event Stream Recorded ---")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()Benefits of Serverless Patterns
These patterns offer significant advantages for serverless applications:
- Scalability: Easily handle increased load by adding more parallel processes.
- Decoupling: Services operate independently, reducing dependencies and improving resilience.
- Resilience: Failures in one part of a fan-out or scatter-gather workflow don't necessarily stop the entire process.
- Auditability (Event Sourcing): A complete history of changes is invaluable for debugging, compliance, and analytics.
Choosing the Right Pattern
Selecting the correct pattern depends on your specific problem:
- Use Fan-Out when one event needs to trigger multiple independent, parallel actions.
- Use Scatter-Gather when you need to query multiple sources and aggregate their responses.
- Use Event Sourcing when you need a complete, immutable history of changes, or complex temporal queries.
Often, these patterns can be combined within a larger serverless architecture.
Pattern Challenge
A new e-commerce platform needs to process customer orders. When an order is placed, the system must:
- Update inventory.
- Send a confirmation email.
- Generate a shipping label.
- Process payment.
Which serverless architectural pattern is best suited for coordinating these independent tasks after an order is placed?
Patterns Recap
We've explored key serverless architectural patterns: Fan-Out for parallel processing from a single event, Scatter-Gather for aggregating responses from multiple sources, and Event Sourcing for maintaining an immutable history of state changes.
Understanding these patterns helps you design robust, scalable, and resilient serverless applications, choosing the right tool for each complex problem.
Questions Fréquemment Posées
La leçon « Modèles d’architecture sans serveur » est-elle gratuite ?
Oui — le texte complet de « Modèles d’architecture sans serveur » est gratuit à lire ici sur le web. Pour la pratiquer de manière interactive (un éditeur de code intégré et un tuteur IA 24/7) et déverrouiller le reste du cours Serverless AWS Lambda Development, passe à CoddyKit PRO. Le cours Serverless AWS Lambda Development comprend 4 leçons au total.
Qu'est-ce que j'apprendrai dans « Modèles d’architecture sans serveur » ?
Découvrez et appliquez des modèles d’architecture sans serveur courants, tels que la diffusion en éventail, le traitement dispersé-consolidé et la journalisation des événements, pour résoudre efficac… Tu pratiques Serverless AWS Lambda Development avec du code pratique que tu exécutes directement dans le navigateur, et un tuteur IA 24/7 répond à tes questions au fur et à mesure que tu avances dans la leçon.
Dois-je avoir de l'expérience pour commencer Serverless AWS Lambda Development ?
Aucune expérience préalable n'est requise. Serverless AWS Lambda Development sur CoddyKit est structuré pour les débutants jusqu'aux apprenants avancés, donc tu peux commencer ici ou depuis le début et avancer à ton rythme. Ceci est la leçon 3 sur 4.
Combien de temps prend la leçon « Modèles d’architecture sans serveur » ?
La plupart des leçons CoddyKit prennent environ 5–10 minutes. Chacune est courte et interactive, tu progresses régulièrement et tu repiques exactement où tu t'es arrêté sur le web et l'app.
Peux-tu écrire et exécuter du code dans cette leçon Serverless AWS Lambda Development ?
Oui. Chaque leçon Serverless AWS Lambda Development inclut un éditeur de code intégré, tu écris et exécutes du vrai code directement dans ton navigateur et tu reçois des retours IA instantanés — aucune configuration locale requise.
Toutes les leçons de ce cours
- Déploiements Canary et Blue/Green
- Créer des systèmes sans serveur résilients
- Modèles d’architecture sans serveur
- Optimisation des coûts dans les architectures sans serveur