0Pricing
NestJS Enterprise Backend APIs · Lesson

Defining SLOs and Error Budgets

Translate latency and error metrics into measurable service-level objectives and alerting.

Defining SLOs and Error Budgets is a free NestJS Enterprise Backend APIs lesson on CoddyKit — lesson 4 of 4. You can read the complete lesson below for free — then practise it hands-on in the browser with a built-in code editor and a 24/7 AI tutor. It is part of the NestJS Enterprise Backend APIs learning path, one of 4 lessons in the course, and your progress syncs across the web and the CoddyKit app.

From Metrics to Promises

Your NestJS API already emits latency and error metrics. But raw numbers like p99 = 412ms mean nothing without a target. An SLO (Service-Level Objective) turns a metric into a promise: "99.9% of requests succeed within 300ms over a rolling 28 days."

  • SLI — the Service-Level Indicator: the actual measured quantity (e.g. fraction of good requests).
  • SLO — the target you commit to for that SLI (e.g. 99.9%).
  • SLA — the contractual consequence if you miss the SLO (refunds, credits).

In this lesson you translate your existing latency and error metrics into SLOs, derive an error budget, and wire up budget-burn alerting.

Defining a Good Event

Every SLI is a ratio of good events / valid events. The hard part is defining "good" precisely. For an HTTP API, a request is usually valid if it reaches your handler (exclude 404s for unknown routes and client-cancelled requests), and good if it is both fast enough and not a server error.

  • Availability SLI: good = status code not in 5xx.
  • Latency SLI: good = served under a threshold (e.g. 300ms).

Note that 4xx responses are normally not failures of your service — a 400 Bad Request means the client sent bad input. Counting them against your budget would punish you for client mistakes.

type RequestOutcome = {
  statusCode: number;
  latencyMs: number;
};

const LATENCY_THRESHOLD_MS = 300;

function isValid(o: RequestOutcome): boolean {
  // Exclude client errors from the denominator; they are not our fault.
  return o.statusCode < 400 || o.statusCode >= 500;
}

function isGood(o: RequestOutcome): boolean {
  const serverError = o.statusCode >= 500;
  const tooSlow = o.latencyMs > LATENCY_THRESHOLD_MS;
  return !serverError && !tooSlow;
}

const sample: RequestOutcome = { statusCode: 200, latencyMs: 142 };
console.log('valid:', isValid(sample), 'good:', isGood(sample));

Computing an SLI

Once you can classify each request, the SLI is just a fraction over a time window: good / valid. Multiply by 100 for a percentage. This is the same math whether you compute it from in-memory counters, Prometheus, or a data warehouse.

Here we compute an availability SLI over a batch of request outcomes. Keeping it pure and standalone makes it trivial to unit-test before wiring it into your monitoring pipeline.

type Outcome = { statusCode: number };

function availabilitySli(outcomes: Outcome[]): number {
  const valid = outcomes.filter(o => o.statusCode < 400 || o.statusCode >= 500);
  const good = valid.filter(o => o.statusCode < 500);
  if (valid.length === 0) return 1; // no traffic = perfect by convention
  return good.length / valid.length;
}

const window: Outcome[] = [
  { statusCode: 200 }, { statusCode: 200 }, { statusCode: 500 },
  { statusCode: 404 }, { statusCode: 200 }, { statusCode: 503 },
];

const sli = availabilitySli(window);
console.log('SLI:', (sli * 100).toFixed(2) + '%');

Choosing a Target and Window

An SLO is an SLI plus a target and a rolling window. Two decisions matter:

  • The number of nines. 99.9% ("three nines") allows ~43 minutes of badness per 30 days. 99.99% allows only ~4.3 minutes. Each extra nine is roughly 10x more expensive to engineer.
  • The window length. A 28- or 30-day rolling window is standard. Shorter windows react faster but are noisier; longer windows are smoother but forgive incidents slowly.

Pick targets from what users actually need, not from what you currently achieve. Don't promise 99.99% if 99.9% keeps customers happy — the extra nine costs real engineering effort.

The Error Budget

The error budget is the inverse of your SLO: the amount of failure you are allowed. If your SLO is 99.9%, your error budget is 1 - 0.999 = 0.1% of requests over the window.

This reframing is powerful: instead of "don't break anything," you get a concrete quantity to spend. As long as budget remains, the team can ship risky changes. When it's exhausted, you freeze features and focus on reliability.

function errorBudget(slo: number, totalRequests: number) {
  const allowedBadFraction = 1 - slo;
  const allowedBadRequests = Math.floor(totalRequests * allowedBadFraction);
  return { allowedBadFraction, allowedBadRequests };
}

const monthlyTraffic = 5_000_000;
const budget = errorBudget(0.999, monthlyTraffic);

console.log('Allowed bad fraction:', (budget.allowedBadFraction * 100).toFixed(2) + '%');
console.log('Allowed bad requests:', budget.allowedBadRequests.toLocaleString());

Budget as Allowable Downtime

It is often more intuitive to express an availability SLO as allowable downtime. Multiply the error-budget fraction by the window duration. For a 30-day window:

  • 99% → ~7.2 hours/month
  • 99.9% → ~43.2 minutes/month
  • 99.95% → ~21.6 minutes/month
  • 99.99% → ~4.3 minutes/month

Showing stakeholders "43 minutes" lands far better than "0.1%". The code below turns any SLO into a human-readable downtime allowance.

function allowableDowntime(slo: number, windowDays = 30): string {
  const windowMinutes = windowDays * 24 * 60;
  const downtimeMinutes = windowMinutes * (1 - slo);
  if (downtimeMinutes >= 60) {
    return (downtimeMinutes / 60).toFixed(1) + ' hours';
  }
  return downtimeMinutes.toFixed(1) + ' minutes';
}

for (const slo of [0.99, 0.999, 0.9995, 0.9999]) {
  console.log((slo * 100) + '% ->', allowableDowntime(slo));
}

Tracking Remaining Budget

During an incident the key question is: how much budget is left? Track consumed budget as a fraction of the total allowance. A value of 0 means full budget; 1.0 means fully exhausted; above 1.0 means you have already breached the SLO for the window.

This single number drives dashboards, deploy freezes, and alert routing. Expose it as a gauge so on-call engineers can see at a glance whether they can keep shipping.

function budgetConsumed(
  badRequests: number,
  totalRequests: number,
  slo: number,
): number {
  const allowedBad = totalRequests * (1 - slo);
  if (allowedBad === 0) return badRequests > 0 ? Infinity : 0;
  return badRequests / allowedBad;
}

const total = 2_000_000;
const bad = 1500;
const consumed = budgetConsumed(bad, total, 0.999);

console.log('Budget consumed:', (consumed * 100).toFixed(1) + '%');
console.log('Remaining:', ((1 - consumed) * 100).toFixed(1) + '%');
console.log('Can ship features:', consumed < 1 ? 'yes' : 'FREEZE');

Instrumenting NestJS Requests

To compute SLIs in production you need per-request data. A NestJS interceptor is the cleanest hook: it sees every request, can time it with rxjs/tap, and records the outcome to your metrics backend.

This interceptor is framework code (it depends on NestJS and a metrics service), so it is not a standalone runnable program — but it shows exactly where SLI classification belongs in a real API.

import {
  Injectable, NestInterceptor, ExecutionContext, CallHandler,
} from '@nestjs/common';
import { Observable } from 'rxjs';
import { tap } from 'rxjs/operators';
import { SloMetrics } from './slo-metrics.service';

@Injectable()
export class SloInterceptor implements NestInterceptor {
  constructor(private readonly metrics: SloMetrics) {}

  intercept(ctx: ExecutionContext, next: CallHandler): Observable<unknown> {
    const start = process.hrtime.bigint();
    const res = ctx.switchToHttp().getResponse();

    return next.handle().pipe(
      tap({
        next: () => this.record(res.statusCode, start),
        error: () => this.record(500, start),
      }),
    );
  }

  private record(statusCode: number, start: bigint) {
    const latencyMs = Number(process.hrtime.bigint() - start) / 1e6;
    this.metrics.observe({ statusCode, latencyMs });
  }
}

Burn Rate: Spending Too Fast

A single threshold ("budget < 0%") alerts you only after the SLO is already blown. Google's SRE practice instead alerts on burn rate: how fast you are consuming budget relative to a sustainable pace.

A burn rate of 1 means you will exactly exhaust the budget by the end of the window. A burn rate of 14.4 over one hour means you'd burn the entire 30-day budget in about 2 hours — clearly page-worthy.

Formula: burnRate = (observed bad rate) / (allowed bad rate), where allowed bad rate = 1 - SLO.

function burnRate(
  badInWindow: number,
  totalInWindow: number,
  slo: number,
): number {
  const observedBadRate = totalInWindow === 0 ? 0 : badInWindow / totalInWindow;
  const allowedBadRate = 1 - slo;
  return observedBadRate / allowedBadRate;
}

// 1h window: 2% of 100k requests failed, SLO 99.9%
const rate = burnRate(2000, 100_000, 0.999);
console.log('Burn rate:', rate.toFixed(1) + 'x');
console.log('Verdict:', rate >= 14.4 ? 'PAGE NOW' : 'ok');

Multi-Window, Multi-Burn-Rate Alerts

Alerting on a single window is a trade-off: short windows catch fast burns but flap on blips; long windows are stable but slow. The SRE workbook recommends combining multiple windows with multiple burn-rate thresholds:

  • Fast page: burn rate ≥ 14.4 over 1h AND ≥ 14.4 over 5m. Burns 2% of a 30-day budget in 1h.
  • Slow ticket: burn rate ≥ 1 over 6h (and a confirming shorter window).

The short "confirming" window prevents alerting on a spike that has already recovered. Requiring both windows to fire keeps alerts both sensitive and quiet.

type Window = { badRate: number };

function shouldPage(
  long: Window, short: Window, threshold: number, slo: number,
): boolean {
  const allowed = 1 - slo;
  const longBurn = long.badRate / allowed;
  const shortBurn = short.badRate / allowed;
  return longBurn >= threshold && shortBurn >= threshold;
}

const slo = 0.999;
const fastPage = shouldPage(
  { badRate: 0.03 }, // last 1h
  { badRate: 0.025 }, // last 5m confirming
  14.4, slo,
);
console.log('Fire fast page:', fastPage);

Operationalizing the Error Budget Policy

SLOs only change behaviour if there is a written error budget policy everyone agrees to. A typical policy:

  • Budget healthy (>25% left): ship freely, take calculated risks.
  • Budget low (<25% left): require extra review, prioritise reliability work.
  • Budget exhausted (≤0): feature freeze — only reliability and bug fixes until the rolling window recovers.

Crucially, the policy must be agreed by both product and engineering before an incident. The error budget then becomes an objective arbiter, replacing arguments about "is it stable enough to ship" with a number.

type Policy = 'SHIP_FREELY' | 'EXTRA_REVIEW' | 'FREEZE';

function policyFor(remainingFraction: number): Policy {
  if (remainingFraction <= 0) return 'FREEZE';
  if (remainingFraction < 0.25) return 'EXTRA_REVIEW';
  return 'SHIP_FREELY';
}

for (const remaining of [0.8, 0.2, 0.0, -0.1]) {
  console.log((remaining * 100).toFixed(0) + '% left ->', policyFor(remaining));
}

Quick Check

Test your understanding of error budgets and burn-rate alerting.

Recap

You translated latency and error metrics into measurable SLOs:

  • SLI = good / valid events. Define "good" (no 5xx, under a latency threshold) and "valid" (exclude client 4xx) precisely before computing the ratio.
  • SLO = SLI + target + rolling window. Choose nines from user need, not current performance; 99.9% over 28-30 days is a sane default.
  • Error budget = 1 - SLO. Express it as allowable downtime (99.9% ≈ 43 min/month) to communicate with stakeholders.
  • Burn rate = observed bad rate / allowed bad rate. Use multi-window, multi-burn-rate alerts (e.g. 14.4x over 1h + 5m) to page early without flapping.
  • A written error budget policy turns the budget into an objective decision-maker for shipping vs. freezing.

In a NestJS API, an interceptor records each request outcome, feeding the SLI counters that power your dashboards and alerts.

Frequently asked questions

Is the “Defining SLOs and Error Budgets” lesson free?

Yes — the full text of “Defining SLOs and Error Budgets” is free to read here on the web, and the NestJS Enterprise Backend APIs course includes 4 lessons in total. To practise it interactively (a built-in code editor and a 24/7 AI tutor) and unlock the rest of the NestJS Enterprise Backend APIs course, upgrade to CoddyKit PRO.

What will I learn in “Defining SLOs and Error Budgets”?

Translate latency and error metrics into measurable service-level objectives and alerting. You practise NestJS Enterprise Backend APIs with hands-on code you run directly in the browser, and a 24/7 AI tutor answers your questions as you work through the lesson.

Do I need any experience to start NestJS Enterprise Backend APIs?

No prior experience is required. NestJS Enterprise Backend APIs on CoddyKit is structured for beginners through advanced learners; this is — lesson 4 of 4, so you can start here or from the beginning and move at your own pace.

How long does the “Defining SLOs and Error Budgets” lesson take?

Most CoddyKit lessons take about 5–10 minutes. Each one is bite-sized and interactive, so you make steady progress and pick up exactly where you left off across the web and the app.

Can I write and run code in this NestJS Enterprise Backend APIs lesson?

Yes. Every NestJS Enterprise Backend APIs lesson includes a built-in code editor, so you write and run real code right in your browser and get instant AI feedback — no local setup required.

All lessons in this course

  1. Timeouts, Retries, and Bulkheads with Interceptors
  2. Circuit Breakers for Downstream Failures
  3. Distributed Tracing with OpenTelemetry
  4. Defining SLOs and Error Budgets
← Back to NestJS Enterprise Backend APIs