tRPC End-to-End Type Safe APIs · درس

اختبار تكامل أجهزة توجيه tRPC

أعدّوا اختبارات تكامل للتحقق من التفاعل الصحيح بين إجراءات tRPC المختلفة واعتمادياتها.

اختبار تكامل أجهزة توجيه tRPC درس مجاني في tRPC End-to-End Type Safe APIs على CoddyKit. هذا هو الدرس 2 من أصل 4. يمكنك قراءة الدرس كاملاً أدناه مجاناً — ثم تمرن عليه مباشرة في المتصفح باستخدام محرر أكواد مدمج ومدرس ذكاء اصطناعي متاح 24/7. هذا الدرس جزء من مسار التعلم في tRPC End-to-End Type Safe APIs، وتقدمك يتزامن عبر الويب وتطبيق CoddyKit. تتضمن دورة tRPC End-to-End Type Safe APIs 4 دروس في المجموع.

بعض أجزاء هذا الدرس لم تُترجم بعد وتظهر باللغة الإنجليزية.

What are Integration Tests?

Welcome to integration testing for tRPC! While unit tests check individual functions, integration tests verify how different parts of your tRPC application work together.

This often involves testing the interaction between tRPC procedures and external dependencies, like a database or another service.

Unit vs. Integration Tests

Let's clarify the difference:

Unit Tests: Focus on isolating a single tRPC procedure. They mock all external dependencies to test the procedure's logic alone.
Integration Tests: Test the flow between multiple procedures or between a procedure and a real (or mocked) external dependency, like ensuring a mutation correctly updates a database.

Setting Up for Integration Tests

For integration tests, you need a controlled environment. This often means:

Using an in-memory database or a dedicated test database instance.
Mocking only necessary external services, not core dependencies like your database.
Setting up a tRPC test caller to invoke procedures directly, bypassing HTTP requests.

Creating a tRPC Test Caller

To call your tRPC procedures directly within tests, you create a test caller. This object lets you interact with your router without a full HTTP server, making tests faster and easier to set up.

Try running this example to see a basic caller in action:

import { initTRPC } from '@trpc/server';
import { z } from 'zod';

const t = initTRPC.context<any>().create();
const publicProcedure = t.procedure;

const appRouter = t.router({
  greeting: publicProcedure
    .input(z.object({ name: z.string() }).optional())
    .query(({ input }) => {
      return `Hello, ${input?.name || 'world'}!`;
    }),
  addNumber: publicProcedure
    .input(z.object({ num1: z.number(), num2: z.number() }))
    .mutation(({ input }) => {
      return input.num1 + input.num2;
    }),
});

const caller = appRouter.createCaller({});

async function runSimulatedTest() {
  console.log("Simulating tRPC integration test...");

  const greetingResult = await caller.greeting.query({ name: "Coddy" });
  console.log("Greeting result:", greetingResult);

  const sumResult = await caller.addNumber.mutation({ num1: 5, num2: 3 });
  console.log("Sum result:", sumResult);
}

runSimulatedTest();

Testing a Query Procedure

Integration tests for queries verify that data is fetched correctly, often involving a mock database. We'll ensure the query returns the expected data based on the current state.

Observe how the greeting query behaves with and without input:

import { initTRPC } from '@trpc/server';
import { z } from 'zod';

const t = initTRPC.context<any>().create();
const publicProcedure = t.procedure;

const appRouter = t.router({
  greeting: publicProcedure
    .input(z.object({ name: z.string() }).optional())
    .query(({ input }) => {
      // In a real test, this might fetch from a DB
      return `Hello, ${input?.name || 'world'}!`;
    }),
});

const caller = appRouter.createCaller({});

async function testGreetingQuery() {
  console.log("--- Testing 'greeting' query ---");

  // Test with a name
  const resultWithName = await caller.greeting.query({ name: "Alice" });
  console.log("Result with name:", resultWithName);

  // Test without a name (default behavior)
  const resultNoName = await caller.greeting.query();
  console.log("Result no name:", resultNoName);

  console.log("Query tests complete.");
}

testGreetingQuery();

Testing a Mutation Procedure

Mutations change data. An integration test for a mutation should verify that the data changes as expected and that subsequent queries reflect those changes. We'll simulate an in-memory database.

import { initTRPC } from '@trpc/server';
import { z } from 'zod';

const t = initTRPC.context<any>().create();
const publicProcedure = t.procedure;

// Simulate an in-memory database
const _db: { messages: string[] } = { messages: [] };

const appRouter = t.router({
  getMessages: publicProcedure
    .query(() => _db.messages),
  addMessage: publicProcedure
    .input(z.object({ text: z.string() }))
    .mutation(({ input }) => {
      _db.messages.push(input.text);
      return input.text;
    }),
});

const caller = appRouter.createCaller({});

async function testAddMessageMutation() {
  console.log("--- Testing 'addMessage' mutation ---");

  // 1. Check initial state
  let initialMessages = await caller.getMessages.query();
  console.log("Initial messages:", initialMessages);

  // 2. Perform mutation
  const addedText = await caller.addMessage.mutation({ text: "Hello tRPC!" });
  console.log("Added message:", addedText);

  // 3. Check state after mutation
  let updatedMessages = await caller.getMessages.query();
  console.log("Updated messages:", updatedMessages);

  // 4. Perform another mutation
  await caller.addMessage.mutation({ text: "More data!" });
  updatedMessages = await caller.getMessages.query();
  console.log("Further updated messages:", updatedMessages);

  console.log("Mutation tests complete.");
}

testAddMessageMutation();

Verifying Merged Routers

In larger tRPC applications, you'll organize your API into multiple routers and then merge them into a root router. Integration tests should confirm that procedures from different merged routers can be accessed and interact correctly.

import { initTRPC } from '@trpc/server';
import { z } from 'zod';

const t = initTRPC.context<any>().create();
const publicProcedure = t.procedure;

// Simulate an in-memory database
const _db: { users: string[]; products: string[] } = { users: [], products: [] };

// User router
const userRouter = t.router({
  getUsers: publicProcedure.query(() => _db.users),
  addUser: publicProcedure
    .input(z.object({ name: z.string() }))
    .mutation(({ input }) => {
      _db.users.push(input.name);
      return input.name;
    }),
});

// Product router
const productRouter = t.router({
  getProducts: publicProcedure.query(() => _db.products),
  addProduct: publicProcedure
    .input(z.object({ name: z.string() }))
    .mutation(({ input }) => {
      _db.products.push(input.name);
      return input.name;
    }),
});

// Root router merging user and product routers
const appRouter = t.router({
  user: userRouter,
  product: productRouter,
});

const caller = appRouter.createCaller({});

async function testMergedRouters() {
  console.log("--- Testing merged routers ---");

  // Add a user
  await caller.user.addUser.mutation({ name: "Bob" });
  const users = await caller.user.getUsers.query();
  console.log("Users after adding Bob:", users);

  // Add a product
  await caller.product.addProduct.mutation({ name: "Laptop" });
  const products = await caller.product.getProducts.query();
  console.log("Products after adding Laptop:", products);

  console.log("All users:", await caller.user.getUsers.query());
  console.log("All products:", await caller.product.getProducts.query());

  console.log("Merged router tests complete.");
}

testMergedRouters();

Testing with Context Data

Many tRPC procedures rely on the context object, which might contain data like an authenticated user's ID or roles. In integration tests, you'll provide a mock context when creating your caller to simulate different user states.

import { initTRPC, TRPCError } from '@trpc/server';
import { z } from 'zod';

// Define the shape of your context
interface MyContext {
  userId?: string;
  isAdmin?: boolean;
}

const t = initTRPC.context<MyContext>().create();
const publicProcedure = t.procedure;

const protectedProcedure = publicProcedure.use(
  t.middleware(({ ctx, next }) => {
    if (!ctx.userId) {
      throw new TRPCError({ code: 'UNAUTHORIZED', message: 'Not authenticated' });
    }
    return next({ ctx: { ...ctx, userId: ctx.userId } });
  })
);

const adminProcedure = protectedProcedure.use(
  t.middleware(({ ctx, next }) => {
    if (!ctx.isAdmin) {
      throw new TRPCError({ code: 'FORBIDDEN', message: 'Not an admin' });
    }
    return next({ ctx: { ...ctx, isAdmin: ctx.isAdmin } });
  })
);

const appRouter = t.router({
  whoAmI: protectedProcedure.query(({ ctx }) => `You are user ${ctx.userId}`),
  adminAction: adminProcedure.mutation(() => "Admin action successful!"),
});

async function testWithMockContext() {
  console.log("--- Testing with mock context ---");

  // 1. Test unauthenticated user
  const unauthCaller = appRouter.createCaller({});
  try {
    await unauthCaller.whoAmI.query();
  } catch (error: any) {
    console.log("Unauthenticated user error:", error.message);
  }

  // 2. Test authenticated user
  const authCaller = appRouter.createCaller({ userId: "user123" });
  const userResult = await authCaller.whoAmI.query();
  console.log("Authenticated user result:", userResult);

  // 3. Test non-admin user trying admin action
  try {
    await authCaller.adminAction.mutation();
  } catch (error: any) {
    console.log("Non-admin user error:", error.message);
  }

  // 4. Test admin user
  const adminCaller = appRouter.createCaller({ userId: "admin456", isAdmin: true });
  const adminResult = await adminCaller.adminAction.mutation();
  console.log("Admin user result:", adminResult);

  console.log("Context tests complete.");
}

testWithMockContext();

Cleaning Up Test Data

Integration tests that modify shared state (like a database) can create dependencies between tests if not managed carefully. It's crucial to clean up any created data after each test or test suite.

Use beforeEach/afterEach hooks in your test runner.
Reset mock databases or truncate tables to ensure tests are isolated and repeatable.

Integration Test Challenge

Consider a tRPC setup where a userRouter handles user creation and a postRouter handles post creation, with posts requiring a valid userId. You are writing an integration test.

Recap: Integration Testing tRPC

We've explored how to perform integration tests for tRPC routers. You learned to:

Use a test caller to invoke procedures directly.
Test both query and mutation procedures, observing state changes.
Verify interactions across merged routers.
Provide mock context for authenticated tests.
Understand the importance of test data cleanup.

Integration tests are vital for ensuring your tRPC API's components work harmoniously and correctly interact with dependencies.

الأسئلة الشائعة

هل درس «اختبار تكامل أجهزة توجيه tRPC» مجاني؟

نعم — نص درس «اختبار تكامل أجهزة توجيه tRPC» كامل متاح مجاناً هنا على الويب. لتمرينه بشكل تفاعلي (محرر أكواد مدمج ومدرس ذكاء اصطناعي متاح 24/7) وفتح باقي دورة tRPC End-to-End Type Safe APIs، انتقل إلى CoddyKit PRO. تتضمن دورة tRPC End-to-End Type Safe APIs 4 دروس في المجموع.

ماذا ستتعلم في «اختبار تكامل أجهزة توجيه tRPC»؟

أعدّوا اختبارات تكامل للتحقق من التفاعل الصحيح بين إجراءات tRPC المختلفة واعتمادياتها. تتمرن على tRPC End-to-End Type Safe APIs مع أكواد عملية تشغلها مباشرة في المتصفح، ومدرس ذكاء اصطناعي متاح 24/7 يجيب على أسئلتك أثناء عملك.

هل أحتاج إلى خبرة سابقة لأبدأ tRPC End-to-End Type Safe APIs؟

لا تُشترط خبرة سابقة. tRPC End-to-End Type Safe APIs على CoddyKit منظم للمبتدئين حتى المتقدمين، لذا يمكنك البدء من هنا أو من البداية والتقدم بسرعتك الخاصة. هذا هو الدرس 2 من أصل 4.

كم من الوقت يستغرق درس «اختبار تكامل أجهزة توجيه tRPC»؟

معظم دروس CoddyKit تستغرق حوالي 5–10 دقائق. كل منها موجز وتفاعلي، لذا تحرز تقدماً مستمراً وتستأنف من حيث توقفت عبر الويب والتطبيق.

هل يمكنني كتابة وتشغيل أكواد في درس tRPC End-to-End Type Safe APIs هذا؟

نعم. كل درس في tRPC End-to-End Type Safe APIs يتضمن محرر أكواد مدمج، لذا تكتب وتشغل أكواداً حقيقية مباشرة في متصفحك وتحصل على تعليقات فورية من الذكاء الاصطناعي — بدون إعداد محلي.

جميع الدروس في هذه الدورة

اختبار وحدات إجراءات tRPC
اختبار تكامل أجهزة توجيه tRPC
استراتيجيات الاختبار من البداية إلى النهاية
محاكاة السياق والتبعيات في اختبارات tRPC

← العودة إلى tRPC End-to-End Type Safe APIs